After Michigan spill, familiar concerns about pipeline regulators
Marian Wang | ProPublica |
Aug 16, 2010
Emergency cleanup operations following an oil spill in Michigan wrapped up last week, but some are still voicing concerns [1] about the adequacy of the nation’s pipeline regulators—an issue that, unlike the regulation of offshore drilling before the Gulf disaster, has largely escaped national attention. The Washington Independent notes that the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, which regulates 2.3 million miles of oil and natural gas pipelines, has adopted “all or parts of at least 29 standards written by the oil and gas industry [2].” Specifically, the rules were written by two trade groups—the American Petroleum Institute and the American Gas Association. And perhaps more troubling is the lack of transparency [2] about those standards. From the Independent:
The pipeline regulatory agency is plagued with some of the same problems [3]faced by the agency formerly known as the Minerals Management Service—now the Bureau of Ocean Energy—which oversees offshore drilling. Inspectors are lacking. (By the Independent’s count, the agency has 94 pipeline inspectors [4]; by the Houston Chronicle’s count, it has 135 [5].) The agency’s head, prior to her appointment as administrator of the agency, worked for Enbridge Energy Partners, the same Canadian pipeline company [1] responsible for the Michigan spill. But unlike its offshore drilling counterparts, it seems that by law, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration also has a more limited mandate [4]. Here’s the Independent:
|












