In Alaska, archeologists unearth ancient bronze buckle from Asia
Doug O'Harra |
Nov 14, 2011
A bronze buckle cast in Asia at least 1,400 years ago was discovered last August in an archaeological dig on the shore of the Seward Peninsula, marking the first time such technology has been unearthed in Alaska. The buckle — a rectangular bar with a broken circular — was found inside an excavation of a 1,000-year-old Inupiat house that had been dug into a beach ridge at Cape Espenberg by a team from the University of Colorado at Boulder. The object spans 2 inches by 1 inch, with a bevel on one side and concave shape on the other — all indications that it had been created in a mold, according to archaeologist and CU research associate John Hoffecker. "I was totally astonished," Hoffecker in this story posted by UC Boulder. "The object appears to be older than the house we were excavating by at least a few hundred years." A seven-member team, led by Hoffecker, was working the site as part of a larger effort to study how ancient Native Alaskans responded to climate change, especially during a Northern Hemispheric heat wave called the Medieval Warm Period. Doctoral student Jeremy Foin, from the University of California at Davis, was sifting soil through an archaelogical screen when he spied the buckle. The soil had been excavated from beneath three feet of sediment in what would have been the entryway into the house.
"The shape of the object immediately caught my eye," Foin said in this story. "After I saw that it clearly had been cast in a mold, my first thought was disbelief, quickly followed by the realization that I had found something of potentially great significance." Other prehistoric and pre-contact materials from Asia have occasionally been unearthed in Alaska and the Yukon Territory, suggesting that Pacific Rim people traded goods and technology long before Russian fur traders and European explorers ventured into the region in the late 18th century. Old Chinese coins have been discovered in coastal Alaska, for instance, and were sometimes sewn into tunics by Tlingit people to create armor. Last summer, two Chinese coins were discovered by archaeologists in the Yukon. The finds included a 340-year-old object minted during the Qing Dynasty reign of Emperor Kangxi, unearthed at a dig on a bluff overlooking the Yukon River about 150 miles northwest of Whitehorse. (See photos of it at the Yukon News.) The buckle was much older. It emerged from the dirt with a small hunk of leather still wrapped around the rectangular bar. A radiocarbon analysis of the material dates from about year 600 CE. The buckle itself could be far older, Hoffecker said. The original owners might have used the device in a harness, or as part of an ornament for a horse, the scientists said. Just how Inupiat Alaskans deployed the object remains a mystery. The scientists speculated that the Alaska Natives might have also used it as some kind of a clasp, or possibly as part of regalia worn by a shaman. What they do know is this: The practice of casting copper and tin to create bronze was unknown in prehistoric Alaska, suggesting that the buckle had to come from East Asia. As a result, the artifact offers more evidence for long-distance trade from production centers in either Korea, China, Manchuria or southern Siberia into Alaska and the Western Hemisphere, according to team member Owen Mason. People began casting bronze in the steppe region of southern Siberia several thousand years ago. Another intriguing possibility: What if the buckle came to Alaska in the possession of the first Eskimo immigrants — ancestors of the Inupiat people who spread across the Arctic beginning about 1,500 years ago? "It was possibly valuable enough so that people hung onto it for generations, passing it down through families," Mason said here. Contact Doug O'Harra at doug(at)alaskadispatch.com
by fakename | November 15, 2011 - 8:13am
All it took for China to lay modern-day claim to TIbet was the 640AD marriage of a Tibetan King to a Chinese Princess. In the Han mind, this buckle now means China owns Alaska.
by Khiva | November 15, 2011 - 12:25am
Perhaps the migration of peoples was not unidirectional or permanent. Perhaps some people went back and forth. The idea that the artifact must have been brought to Alaska by a second (Chinese) party and there exchanged or bartered is predicated on the assumption that no person residing in Alaska ever went to China for any reason. Perhaps the ancestors of the Inuit in whose home the artifact was discovered went over to China and acquired it there. A supposition about how the artifact got to Alaska based on (apparently) the technological superiority of the people at the point of origin of manufacture seems to me a dubious and culture-biased deduction.
by Oldhaines | November 15, 2011 - 8:23pm
Probably no less dubious than any other theory regarding the provenance of such an object. It would also seem to be the better bet that the "technologically superior" culture would have been the one more likely to have undertaken the extensive travel required for the object to have made it's way to Alaska. Ps; That was a backhanded way for you to get it out there but it's still the race card...
by Khiva | November 15, 2011 - 10:04pm
My point was that "more likely" in this case quickly became "did" without any particular evidence other than what appears to the casual observer to be culturally biased assumptions. Such assumptions are often the way bad history, bad archeology, and bad anthropology get written. If the cast of the story had stayed with "more likely," which I would agree with, I would have made no protest. But at present I see no evidence to suggest that trade travel was monodirectional. The purpose of my post was to call a "red card" on the "race card" I saw in the article.
by Oldhaines | November 15, 2011 - 11:23pm
I cede your point, regarding "More likely" becoming "Did". I should have been more aware of that as well. But I stand by my observation that it is a good bet that the more advance culture was the one that did the traveling. I am sure you can see it in your minds eye... the guy with the horse and buggy (so to speak) will enjoy travel of long distances far more than the poor schmuck who has to hoof it on his own.
by rewisecarver | November 14, 2011 - 2:17pm
This is very a very important discovery and corresponds with Froleich and Rainy's discovery at Pt. Hope-Tigara of a steel drill tip in a Ipiutaq period house 900-1000 BP in the late 1940's. Analysis indicated that the steel bit tips had originated in Northern China or Manchuria. A similar source is implied for the Yupik dragon Palyarik found painted on so many traditional objects. Check it out!! |













Comments