Alaska bison hunt auction exposes feud between Natives, Outdoors Council
Alex DeMarban |
Nov 02, 2011
At an annual convention designed to build unity among the many, the Alaska Federation of Natives set the stage for a clash with one of the state's most powerful sportsman's organizations. It's a potential tiff over a valuable bison-hunting auction permit, but it's rooted in a longstanding feud over rural subsistence with the Alaska Outdoor Council. The council's Alaska Fish and Wildlife Fund, which is involved in legal action against efforts supported by AFN, hopes to auction off the permit and raise $20,000. A resolution passed by the influential Native organization says the state never should have awarded the rare auction permit for Delta Junction bison to the outdoor council. AFN calls the state's decision "offensive" -- in part because of the outdoor council's legal attacks against the federal subsistence program that helps rural residents access wild game meat. Thousands of AFN delegates unanimously passed the resolution, which calls on Gov. Sean Parnell and Fish and Game Commissioner Cora Campbell to revoke the permit. No word yet on what the state will do. A spokeswoman with Parnell's office said the governor has not seen the resolution, which was passed Oct. 22. Campbell did not return calls seeking comment. Corey Rossi, Fish and Game's director of wildlife conservation, said he read the resolution but has received no official request from AFN. "We're trying to get a handle on what's happened and see if there's a way to reconcile it," he said. The resolution was one of dozens passed at the three-day AFN convention in Anchorage, where the organization held forums asking how the Native community could work better with state and federal agencies. Bison hunt permit an Alaska prizeThe Delta Junction bison hunt is one of the state's most sought-after hunts. Last year, some 20,000 Alaskans paid a $10 application fee for the chance to win about 100 permits, Rossi said. Only one auction permit is awarded to a nonprofit each year. The outdoor council hopes to sell 1,000 tickets at $20 each in its fundraiser, with a raffle set for next summer unless tickets sell out before then. The benefit of the raffle for hunters is they have multiple chances to win a permit (they can buy multiple tickets). To win a permit through normal procedure, hunters can apply just once a year with the state. AFN's rub with the Alaska Outdoor Council goes back decades. The council's legal actions have eroded subsistence-hunting opportunities designed to benefit Natives, the resolution says, including supporting the lawsuit that led to the state leaving the federal subsistence program. That program puts rural hunters, who are mostly Native, first in line for hunting and fishing on federal lands and waters. In the late 1980s, the state Supreme Court ruled that notion violated the Alaska Constitution's clause guaranteeing equal-access to wildlife, ending rural privilege on state lands. Ahtna, Inc., an Alaska Native regional corporation, introduced the resolution at AFN. Ahtna, representing Native shareholders from the Copper River region northeast of Anchorage, has long locked horns with the outdoor council. Often at issue is villagers' access to another competitive hunt, this time for highly prized Nelchina caribou. The Alaska Fish and Wildlife Conservation Fund is fighting in the Alaska Supreme Court to end the state's community subsistence hunts for the caribou in the region, hunts that were created for hunters in eight Native villages in the Nelchina basin. The state's decision to award the Delta bison auction permit to the council sends an "offensive message to thousands of Alaskans" and helps "finance the AOC's litigation and other anti-subsistence activities," reads the AFN resolution. Natives 'not into sharing'Rod Arno, the outdoor council's executive director, said the group is not attacking Ahtna or subsistence. They're battling a state law that violated the constitution because it favors limited groups of people instead of equal hunting opportunities for all Alaskans.
by Skeptic | November 3, 2011 - 12:48pm
When it comes to subsistence, I bristle at AFN's calls for a race based preference. I'm a strong supporter of rural preference and true "use-based" preference. (Not the old Nelchina Tier II style). That said, AFN is 100% right that the AOC should not be the recipient of the state's largess. Furthermore, I don't think that we should be auctioning off any harvest opportunities.
by quixoticqt | November 3, 2011 - 11:31am
I'm all for what AFN has to say about this issue. Alaska natives have been mistreated for many years. About time the Natives of Alaska make their voice heard and stick up for themselves. qt
by Perry | November 2, 2011 - 5:15pm
Now, I know why my wife, a 59yr. old breast cancer survivor, in attendence at AFN, was yelled at by some old white guy, to "Get out of my way!". Thought it might be Tea Partiers, but outsiders picketing for AOC makes more sense.
by electriceye | November 2, 2011 - 1:28pm
Yes the AOC is clearly anti resident as well as anti Native. Actions speak louder than words. The AOC is closely tied with the Utah organization, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife. Corri Rossi, a founding member of SFW, was appointed into the ADF&G as director of the Division of Wildlife Conservation. That had never been done since statehood. Now, King Rossi has complete control of the who gets a governor permit. And guess who got them this year. The AOC and SFW. Check here: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/license/huntlicense/pdfs/2012_winners.pdf Now King Rossi wants to have even more control. Proposal 44 for the upcoming Board of Game meeting in January has an ADF&G proposal to allow King Rossi to issue these Governors tags during times of year when no other hunter is allowed to hunt. To allow such things as use of helicopters, and hunting statewide instead of a specific area. How do you like that. So mumch for standing up for the rights of the resident Alaska! Proposal 44: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=lib.forcedownload&filepath=/static/regulations/regprocess/gameboard/pdfs/2011-2012/statewide-1-13-12/&filename=statewideproposals.pdf&contenttype=application/pdf ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. And its time for the Governor to do his job and send King Rossi Packing.
by Arcticvillage | November 2, 2011 - 11:15am
This article brings out some very interesting issues not apparent to the average Alaskan. "state Supreme Court ruled that notion violated the Alaska Constitution's clause guaranteeing equal-access to wildlife, ending rural privilege on state lands." "Rod Arno, the outdoor council's executive director, said the group is not attacking Ahtna or subsistence. They're battling a state law that violated the constitution because it favors limited groups of people instead of equal hunting opportunities for all Alaskans." .....and all other non-resident hunters. The Alaska Outdoor Council (AOC) last year petitioned the joint Boards of Game and Fish to make all of the area between Fairbanks and Anchorage one "non-subsistence area." Most urban Alaskans foolishly do not know what that would mean. It means all now 7 billion people in the world would have equal access to moose, caribou, red salmon and all other fish and wildlife. Alaskans in non-subsistence areas lose there priority over other non-resident users. Don't be fooled, the AOC is not only fighting rural users, it is advocating to take away all Alaskans equal-access priority. All caribou, moose and other limited resources in State non-subsistence areas would have to let all non-residents equal drawing access. And of course Nelchina caribou would all be a drawing hunt. The Nelchina caribou hunt would have to allow non-residents, and Alaskans would lose caribou off of their tables. The AOC takes a lot of funding from non-resident sport hunting groups....go figure who they are going to pander to. The AOC does not favor even the State Constitutional priority for Alaskans first, otherwise they would not advocate for large non-subsistence areas. The AOC as only one of many non-profits has been allocated one Delta Bison permit by the state of Alaska. This is a violation of the equal-access clause of the Alaska's constitution. The State of Alaska is violating my equal-access, as well as all other Alaskans rights, by issuing a Delta Bison permit to the AOC for a kick-back. All non-profits should be allowed to apply equally, and one of them drawn, as any other Alaskan might. Apparently the AOC is used to buying their way into the ADF&G's Commissioners Office, and I applaud AFN or any one else that exposes these shady deals.
by opinionated | November 2, 2011 - 12:57pm
There are no laws requiring the State of Alaska to have the same hunting and fishing rules for nonresidents and residents as a quick browse through the regulation book will confirm. Where did you get that idea?
by lippyjr | November 2, 2011 - 9:20am
So the natives want to hunt, somebody might clue them in that that buffalo herd was brought up from the lower 48 from yellowstone (correct me if Iam wrong) As a white anglo saxion Male it maybe time to resort to my calling in life and it wont be pretty. We have poured millions of dollars towards native programs enough is enough. Try to pulling up your population from the dark ages and come to grip with the real world. If you want to hunt how about we take your guns away and hand out sticks and rocks and see how that plays out.
by wager with the wind | November 1, 2011 - 8:32pm
There is more here than meets the eye. Anyone who was up in BB during the 70s knows there were a lot of walrus on the beaches. Headless walrus that is. Enforcing State wildlife laws is a noble goal. Let's hope the money is well spent. Exactly what is Cora Cambell's qualification to be head of Fish and Game other than her crony connections to Alaska's Permanent Political Class whose fishery branch used to be led by a guy now facing federal jail time. Isn't she from Petersburg too? Hmmm. |













Comments