Alaska glaciers losing 46 billion tons of ice each year
Doug O'Harra |
Feb 12, 2012
Alaska glaciers have been shedding about 46 billion tons of ice each year, making America's Arctic state the world's single biggest contributor to glacier-fed sea level rise outside of Greenland or Antarctica, say new estimates published this week in the online edition of the journal of Nature. Still, Alaska remains a wee player in the global ice frappe, producing only about 8.5 percent of the world's annual glacier shrinkage of 526 billion tons, according to the study, led by a team at the University of Colorado at Boulder. The total mass ice loss from Greenland, Antarctica combined with all of Earth's other glaciers and ice caps amounted to about 1,000 cubic miles -- about eight times the water volume of Lake Erie, explained UC-Boulder physicist John Wahr in this story about the work. "The total amount of ice lost to Earth's oceans from 2003 to 2010 would cover the entire United States in about 1 and one-half feet of water," added Wahr, a fellow at the CU-headquartered Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. Most of Alaska's annual ice loss occurs in the snow-bound coastal ranges that crown the Gulf of Alaska, and it's a huge chunk -- contributing about one third of the 150 billion tons of total annual ice loss from 18 regions around the globe outside of the two much larger continental sources. Southern Alaskans take note: we are seasonal witnesses to this process. The inexorable retreat of Portage Glacier from view at Portage Lake, and other shrinkage by ice tongues in Anchorage's Chugach State Park, have all made tiny-but measurable-additions to this overall glacier breakdown. Only shrinkage by the glaciers on Baffin Island (about 35 billion tons) and the Ellesmere Island area (about 34 billion tons) rival the Alaskan retreat, the study reported. Still, size matters. The loss of ice from Alaska and the Canadian Arctic remains small when compared to the losses seen in the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica. Between 2003 and 2010, the continental ice sheets on Greenland dumped 222 billion tons annually, while Antarctica lost 165 billion tons. Measuring gravity with eyes in the skiesTo get the totals, the researchers basically resorted to rocket science, using data gathered by the tandem satellites of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, or GRACE, a joint effort of NASA and Germany. Launched in 2002, the GRACE satellites zip around Earth 16 times each day in a 300-mile-high orbit, traveling about 135 miles apart. They dial in tiny changes in the Earth's gravitational pull and keep track of any shifts in the planet's mass caused by melting ice. These ultra-precise measurements have been producing gravity maps about 1,000 times more accurate than previous efforts. For more detail, here is a primer on how GRACE works and the latest fix on its orbit around the globe. The current study used the satellites to estimate the "mass balance" of the world's glaciers -- the difference between the melt of summer and the growth from snow accumulation during winter. Finding a glacier's mass balance is critical to gauging its health -- whether it's growing or shriveling up -- but can take weeks or months of dangerous, expensive field work spread over many seasons. Only a small fraction of the world's glaciers have been studied on the ground.
by FishinforTuition | February 13, 2012 - 8:11am
Only two hundred years ago, when Captain George Vancouver sailed by Glacier Bay, the bay was a solid sheet of nearly a mile of ice. And Alessandro Malaspina, how many ice cubes does it take to melt a global lie?
by OldHat | February 14, 2012 - 2:47pm
Ya, Glacier Bay was all ice in 1794 when members of the expedition Vancouver commanded looked at it using ship's boats. Their account is a of ~3/4 mile high solid front about 5 miles in from the entrance and lots and lots of bergs in the Bay and Icy Straight There is good evidence that the glacier front was mid way down the current Bay 150-200 years before Vancouver’s exploration, and it probability extended a tongue 4-5 miles out into Icy Straight sometime around 1750. The whole area is highly dynamic. This paper reports on all of Alaska not just a limited area north of Juneau, with those glaciers and ice field straddling the border probably included because the measurement is of physical features, not just lines on a map. From the write-up of this paper in Live Science, the Uni of Bristol Glaciology Centre’s Jonathan Bamber notes in “a commentary published along with the study .... the period was too brief to capture large fluctuations in melting from some areas, such as in the Gulf of Alaska and the high Asian mountains.” The Supplementary Information, makes explicit note of Alaska, mentioning the earlier reports of GRACE data that showed more melt in the ’03-’07 (with higher uncertainty). The uncertainty becomes less as more time passes. But, the trend over the ’03-’10 interval is clearly that large scale melting is going on. The Supplementary Information, published online without a pay wall, has a set of graphs for the 20 area of the globe with sizable ice cover on Page 25 at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nature10847-s1.pdf It’s interesting that the areas showing a distinct melting trend are at high polar and sub-polar latitudes, except for Norway, the Arctic Islands above European Russian to the east, and the Siberia/Kamchatka area. It’s my guess that the Norway/Western Russian Arctic area just doesn’t have that much glacial ice to melt. The seasonal wiggles of gain and loss are very small, and sea ice in that area doesn’t extend nearly as for south in winter as it does in other areas of the Arctic. The GRACE measurements are only for changes in gravity of an area, not of the amount of ice which is mingled with the mass of the planet under it. If an area gains ice the gravity increases, and when it melts and runs off to the sea the area’s gravity declines. I can’t guess what’s happening around Kamchatka. |













Comments