Alaska guiding legend Joe Hendricks charged with 34 felonies
Craig Medred |
Dec 26, 2011
One of Alaska's oldest and most respected big-game guides has been charged with 34 felonies related to illegal hunting in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, most of them alleging that he allowed another unidentified guide to use his exclusive guide area. Joe Hendricks, reached by phone at a winter home in Kentucky, said he couldn't talk much about the lengthy indictment handed down on Dec. 14, but seemed mainly worried about what it would do to his reputation. Alaska has a complicated guiding system that parcels out hunting opportunities to a select handful of master and registered guides. They are then free to hire state-licensed assistant guides to work for them. As it now exists, the system is similar to limited entry in the commercial fisheries off Alaska's coast. The idea behind such systems is to ensure viable incomes for the people who work in them and, theoretically, to enlist the help of these businessmen to protect public resources as wise stewards of Alaska's resources. While busy fishing illegally, Fuglvog masqueraded as an advocate for wise management. Alaska Gov. Frank Murkowski named him as to a seat on the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, and Fuglvog later came close to becoming the director of the National Marine Fisheries Service. The management council is the federal body that largely dictates how multi-million dollar commercial fisheries off Alaska's coast are run. The fisheries service has the ultimate authority for fisheries management in all U.S. coastal waters. Fuglvog had to withdraw his candidacy after his crew ratted out his illegal activities. They revealed he had for years been making false claims about where he was fishing in order to catch fish in other areas where he could maximize profits. An investigation ensued. It eventually led to a plea agreement that saw Fuglvog plead guilty to illegal fishing and quit his job as Murkowski's aide. All of that rocked the commercial fishing business -- not only in Alaska, but nationally. Despite that, however, the federal fisheries service is plowing ahead with plans to privatize ever more fisheries in the belief that commercial fishermen given an ownership share in public resources will behave more responsibly. This is exactly the thinking behind the guide areas in Alaska, though even Hendricks admitted some doubts about whether such schemes work. "I don't think it's gotten any better at all,'' he said. "There's always that 5 percent. What you want to do is weed out the 5 percent. There's like 5 percent who are really bad guys. I'm not one of the bad guys. If I was one of the bad guys, you would have heard about me 25 years ago.'' Hendricks, it should be noted, is not a pilot and does not keep an airplane in his hunting camp. All of the state's most infamous outlaw guides -- men like Ron Hayes and John Graybill -- have been linked to illegal, same-day airborne hunting. With the use of an airplane, it is easy to spot trophy-size Dall sheep, grizzly bears and moose in many parts of Alaska, then land and kill them. It is the reason same-day airborne hunting was made illegal.
by tomclark | December 30, 2011 - 8:47pm
Give him his day in court, but the excuse that it is, "Mostly assistant guide stuff", is not a valid defense. I would agree with LibertyBlogger that "bag limits together with a proper penal code well enforced is" what Alaska needs. This "wise steward" concept being pushed by the very individuals who would gain by its passage sounds alot like the fox requesting unique permission to guard the henhouse. -TomClark
by LibertyBlogger | December 27, 2011 - 9:18am
The last thing an occupational guild, like licensed hunting guides in Alaska, concerns itself with is the benefit of the public at large. Like all locked-up professions the guild's primary aim is to eliminate competition and impose monopoly prices, to harm the public through arbitarily high prices and the lack of offerings. The belief grows in such an atmosphere that the wildlife itself is the sole property of the guild. Seasonal hunting with bag limits together with a proper penal code well enforced is all Alaska can reasonably do to preserve wildlife. Properly managed hunting is often a benefit to the ecosystem. Establishing a guild of hunters and guides is counterproductive to that aim. Guides worth their weight will find plenty of work. The crooks would more quickly be exposed and prosecuted within a free market for guides. This protection of the wildlife through guildism is a well-intended law that has produced quite perverse effects.
by ReneW | December 27, 2011 - 1:53pm
I don't know that I agree with you on all of that. I do know reputable Master Guides who have relied on their assistants who, themselves, are pretty good folks with integrity. You can't control the actions of others, nor do you control the choices they make, and so it's unfortunate that one would be culpable for those decisions and outcomes. Don't be so quick to throw the baby out with the bathwater; nothing's been proven yet. A man does not acquire such an excellent reputation undeservedly.
by bookie71 | December 27, 2011 - 8:27am
I have known Joe for many years and will side with him until it is proven otherwise.
by H_Tuttle | December 27, 2011 - 6:27am
Alaska. Just like everywhere else now. Good going Alaskans!
by StElias | December 26, 2011 - 10:17pm
Oh yes Medred, how so many subtlety suggest disturbing similarities to the Federalie attempts at law enforcement relevant to transgressions of the end of the roader, 71 year old Jim Wilde, 74 year old Kentuckian/Alaskan Guide, Hendricks, and poor 70 year old Papa Pilgrim. Hypocritical crying may make unenlightened ones want to likewise weep. Not me. I dislike cheats, no matter their benefactor's demagogic vindicating rhetoric. |













Comments