The Alaska search and rescue thin line
Craig Medred |
Sep 14, 2011
After the rescue, safely back in Anchorage and more than a little embarrassed, Alaska Department of Fish and Game public information officer Ken Marsh was contemplating a simple question: Cell phone good or cell phone bad? Back in the day, Marsh confessed, he never would have thought of heading off into the woods without a lighter, a jacket and a compass. And yet that is exactly what he did on Thursday evening after work in Anchorage. He drove out north of the city into the Susitna Valley to look for a moose. The evening was warm. He wasn't going far from his truck parked not far off a road west of Wasilla. He really didn't expect to get a moose. And, of course, he had his cell phone if something went wrong. As it turned out, something did go wrong, and he made one of several calls that last week sparked necessary -- but not necessarily vital -- rescues in southcentral Alaska. They were the sort of non-rescue rescues that are increasingly tying up Alaska rescue personnel and state resources. They were the sort of rescues that have helped to inflate the search and rescue budget of the Alaska State Troopers by about 60 percent over the past decade. Given the huge distances in Alaska and the limited number of people trained for what are commonly called SAR (search-and-rescue) missions, these were also rescues with the potential to tie up life-saving assets that might be needed elsewhere. A trooper helicopter earlier this summer took a long nine hours to reach a group of National Outdoor Leadership School students after they were attacked by a grizzly bear in the Talkeetna Mountains in large part because it had been tied up in a futile SAR operation in the Fairbanks area earlier the same day. Two of the NOLS students mauled by that bear had suffered life-threatening injuries. They were being treated by fellow students who could only hope and pray rescuers would arrive before their classmates bled to death. Fortunately, help did come and all did survive, but it was close. NOLS officials later pondered whether the rescue had been delayed by a rescue system bogged down with marginally necessary, unnecessary or even bogus calls for help. These problems are not unique to Alaska, say those involved in SAR. All across the country, the convenience of the cell phone and the creation of the personal locator beacon (PLB) are taxing rescue assets. SAR personnel say that too many people who should be taking care of themselves are instead calling for help. Technology, a marvelous crutchMarsh admits he is one of those who should have been able to take care of himself. He wonders, frankly, what he was thinking that night he went moose hunting. "I probably had a little sense of security with that cell phone," he said. "I always carried a lighter." Always, that is, until recently. Technology is a marvelous crutch. Marsh wasn't the only one to use it in recent days in the Anchorage area. Less than a day after Marsh called troopers, Barbara Wright dialed them from the Twentymile River near Portage to report she was worried about her son, 31-year-old Josh Hoeldt from Eagle River. He'd dropped his mom and her husband on the river to make camp, then pointed his riverboat back downstream toward the Seward Highway bridge to pick up his wife and kids. The Twentymile is not a particularly dangerous river, but when Hoeldt failed to make it back to camp his worried mom called for a search. "AST searched the area using AST Helo-1 from approximately 2339 hours until approximately 0300 hours," troopers later reported. "Due to increasing fog and lack of light the helicopter had to leave the area. The following day prior to resuming search efforts, a family friend located Hoeldt at a cabin on Twentymile River. Hoeldt and his family were not in distress. Hoeldt reported on his return trip to the campsite with his family, darkness prevented him from continuing. Hoeldt and his family spent the night at the cabin with plans to resume the trip in the morning."
by thulefoth | September 16, 2011 - 6:18pm
Under the conditions in which Mr. Marsh found himself, he could have very easily constructed a nice 'mouse nest' in the brush or boughs, tunneled into his mound of soft insuling moss & foliage, and slept soundly until the daylight when he & his friends could have gotten him out without drama or expense. Marsh undoubtedly knows how to do this. Why would he not think to do it? Call his girlfriend, reasure her, then get busy with his nice little flashlight, collecting moss & weeds & boughs, build them into a cozy cocoon ... and crawl into it? How did the presence of a cell phone cause him to forget this? Or more like, view the option as just too silly to follow through on? Did Marsh 'forget' about making a nest, the same way he 'forgot' about carrying matches? And compass? And (cough) a *Jacket*? Wow. That is, in fact, some pretty heavy psychology going on there.
by trhendo | September 17, 2011 - 11:50am
Yep, been there. Early fall hunt, dark, too far from the beach, in-adequate clothing, lighter lost probably during a fall...and no cell phone. But I survived the night. Crawled into the brush, off the ground. Ya, it was a long night, but I actually slept a little. No problem finding my way out in the morning.
by thulefoth | September 21, 2011 - 10:43am
You may have had an 'unfair advantage', *not* having a cell phone! ;)
by Skeptic | September 16, 2011 - 11:31am
Quite simply, if we don't want to rescue a lost mooose hunter, we shouldn't rescue him. But, we certainly should not compel him to feel bad about making the phone call. At any rate, what's this bit about? "NOLS officials later pondered whether the rescue had been delayed by a rescue system bogged down with marginally necessary, unnecessary or even bogus calls for help." First, people can ponder all they want, but I don't think there is any evidence that the the NOLS rescue was bogged down by other, lower priority search activities. Second, the linked article doesn't support the statement at all. Nowhere in that linked article does it mention NOLS officials pondering such a thing. What's the agenda?
by ranchpilot | September 15, 2011 - 6:37pm
Good article, been there done that. Tragedies do not start out with the obvious, they grow one step at a time until its a news story for all of us to scoff at.
by thulefoth | September 16, 2011 - 5:55pm
It's still mainly about what happens between the ears, as these situations unfold. We see, over & over, how strongly impacted folks' judgement is, once the truth of their situation unfolds into their psych. Situations vary ... but *many* of them are totally-obvious little tests ... which an otherwise capable person then flunks.
by Flyboy_AK | September 15, 2011 - 6:02pm
What if that smartphone battery goes dead, or gets wet, or falls out of your pocket. Relying on a compass app and GPS app in a smartphone is a candle in the wind. Not even real reliable backup to real navigational gear, or knowledge..
by thulefoth | September 16, 2011 - 5:45pm
"Not even real reliable backup to real navigational gear, or knowledge.." A lot of people have to be confirming that for themselves. We do hear about people "trying & trying", or putting their device inside their cloths, or rationing their contacts & on-time. People - and the authorities, and the media - absolutely do know what a crap 'safety' measure a phone etc is. And worse yet, SAR KNOWS how many "recoveries" they are performing, of stiffs still clutching their consumer electronic product. Pretty kinky and kinda creepy, really.
by akiceman | September 15, 2011 - 1:24pm
As usual Craig takes a handful of incidents out of many and attempts to paint it as a major issue. Personally I don't see why the press continues to hammer the "idiot hiker calling for help for no reason" story and attempts to link it to budget issues. The SOA is looking at an $11.8 billion bullet gas line, a $5 billion Susitina dam, a $2.7 billion road to Nome and a $500 million road to Juneau and here we have writers fanning the fiscal conservative flames about how we're going over budget for rescue services? Why don't you compare the costs Craig? Instead of writing about 1 idiot out of 10,000 who misuses his or her cellphone why don't you actually tell us what the budget for SAR is in Alaska and compare it to ridiculous things like a multi-billion dollar road to Nome.
by akiceman | September 15, 2011 - 1:42pm
Or to put it another way... the AK SAR budget for 2012 is $577,900. The 2012 budget is $11.4 billion. That equates to .005%.
by thulefoth | September 16, 2011 - 5:30pm
"Or to put it another way", long as those half-million dollar bills are beneath fretting about, let's budget one of them for me? How about we set some percent of your budget, and long as Craig Medred stays below that percent, there shouldn't be any fuss about him dipping into your wallet for this 'n that?
by akiceman | September 18, 2011 - 12:46pm
The irony is that you're probably one of those people cheering for projects like the Road to Juneau.
by thulefoth | September 21, 2011 - 10:57am
No, I'm with you against the road, Ice. I don't need not more stinkin' roads. Worse, I don't need no more bigger stinkin' cities - which is what I think this here road is supposed to achieve. But I'm not a Greenie Road-Hater, either. I just thought your fiscal argument was too tangled up, is all. Truth is, some roads will happen. Some will be 'stopped'. There may be times when roads seem more acceptible, and easier to afford/justify in the budget. WWII was a major cause of Alaska roads. Discover/exploitation of oil was another. Tourism is weak factor, today. If the economy stays permanently feeble, we could see, for example, serious taiga logging that would put in lots of low-tech roads. There is a geopolitical angle to putting roads out to Nome etc, and heightened international competition for the Arctic Ocean etc could raise the profile of such a thing. Us folks that would rather not have more roads will win some, and we'll lose some.
by Scott 2 | September 15, 2011 - 8:48am
Here's an idea: Money earned from the classes offered goes into the search and rescue pot. The incentive: Anyone wondering about in the wilds of Alaska without a permit deserves the rescue bill. Finally, anyone out in the wilds should have a SPOT type device. SPOT (findmespot.com) also offers S&R insurance for I think $25, which covers up to I believe 120k.
by thulefoth | September 16, 2011 - 5:15pm
A backcountry license? A permit to wander the wilds? In order to be "off the grid"? Do you mean, "off the sidewalk/pavement"? Are you thinking, "off the couch"? "Away from your TV"? Without a permit? Someone call the cops. THX 1138
by dano | September 15, 2011 - 12:36am
Amazing, just a few years ago we survived quite well without cell phones. Seems like they make us stupid. |













Comments