Alaska troopers 'throw book' at questionable resident over fishing
Craig Medred |
Nov 29, 2011
For years there have been rumors of non-residents sneaking into the Alaskans-only dipnet fishery at the mouth of the Kenai River to score salmon before scurrying South for the winter, and now the Alaska State Troopers claim they've caught one of the scofflaws. Troopers have charged a Colorado real estate agent with illegally obtaining an Alaska resident fishing license so he could get one of those coveted, Alaskan-only dipnet permits. Realtor Anthony Bartell calls the allegation "total crap." He and troopers have been down this residency road before, he said, adding that Troopers were wrong the first time and they are wrong again. Bartell does not deny he spends most of the year Outside. But, he added, this is because his time is split almost equally among four residences. He established legal residency in Alaska back in the 1990s, he said, and he has maintained it ever since. "I'm a well-to-do guy," he said. "I'm not trying to save $100 (on a fishing license). I'm an Alaska resident. I've been on the Kenai 20 summers. It's where my heart is, and home is where the heart is." And, he adds, he did not dipnet. He picked up the dipnet permit with an eye to trying out this wild-and-crazy technique for catching fish, but he never joined the mob at the mouth of the Kenai slaughtering salmon. He preferred to catch his fish with a rod and reel. No matter how he caught them, however, this is a touchy subject in the 49th state. Oil might be what fuels the Alaska economy, but fish -- especially salmon -- drive northern emotions. Alaskans tend to think of the bounty of salmon that return to the 49th state as "their" fish. More than a few residents are prone to get upset about the coolers full of salmon flowing south through Anchorage's Ted Stevens International Airport every summer. A brief exchange from a popular outdoor forum is indicative of the heated feelings on this topic: when one commenter notes that Alaskans really "hate" non-resident fishermen, a purported local responds that vitriol stems from, among other things, summertime RV traffic. "Many of us have seen stacks and stacks of boxes at the airport, or the rows of RV's that stay for the max limit of 2 weeks in campgrounds (before moving 15 miles down the road and repeating the pattern), complete with smokers, vacuum packers and chest freezers, etc," wrote a commenter named AlaskaHippie. "We've heard folks like this brag about visiting Alaska 'on the cheap' and then scurrying South with hundreds of pounds of processed fish to give away to friends or family or, in some cases, SELL for profit." These emotions, of course, are a little out of touch with reality. Somewhere short of 200 million salmon were harvested in Alaska this year. About 176 million were caught and killed in commercial fisheries. State studies indicate about 80 percent of these commercially caught salmon are hauled in by non-residents, but the commercial catch by non-residents is little noticed. What is noticed is the recreational catch, and Alaskans are extremely possessive about it. State law requires newcomers to the north must spend one complete calendar year in the state before qualifying for a resident hunting or fishing license. When it was alleged in 2010 that U.S. Senate candidate Joe Miller, a man who had by then won the state Republican primary and looked to have a lock on one of the state's two Senate seats, might have once illegally obtained a resident license it became a big deal even though it had happened 16 years earlier when Miller was a law student at Yale. Miller eventually lost the election to write-in Republican incumbent Lisa Murkowski.
by isnarewolves | November 30, 2011 - 8:52am
oh by the way the major of the commerical fleet is non-resident, and alien.
by isnarewolves | November 30, 2011 - 8:10am
why get all caught up in the non resident harvest of fish that is used? we should all be out raged by the millions of pounds of fish that are wasted and throwed away. the nice commerical fisherman term is "BY-CATCH". this waste of fish far exceeds any non resident sport fishery!
by JohnSchwam | November 30, 2011 - 12:35am
Craig,
by David Scheer | November 29, 2011 - 6:36pm
Classic wannabe article bashing commercial fishers, Sarah and Joe.
by sierraseven | November 29, 2011 - 4:48pm
"Authorities in Colorado wouldn't grant him a passport there using an Alaska driver's license as ID, he said." This doesn't ring true to me. Passports are issued by the State Department, not by any state-level authority. Usually in-person applications are done at a post office. I recall once that a friend - an Alaska resident with an Alaskan birth certificate and driver's license - got a passport in South Dakota, where we were working for a few weeks in the summer. We had an opportunity come up for travel right after the job in SD was over, and she needed a passport. There was no problem with her not having a SD driver's license. I can't see why Colorado would be different, since passport issuance is a Federal function. Perhaps someone with more expertise could explain this.
by cdvmermaid | November 29, 2011 - 3:20pm
oh darlings! Do hush! You know darn well, shooting a spouse is one thing!(not much really) But an undotted "I" on a hunting/fishing permit can stick your tail in the pokey. Get over it! Next to taking a whiz in the Yukon or wrestling a polar bear, it is what the heck we do! NOTE TO "Well to do guy" - Good heavens! Who talks that way? Tis better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
by Cynthia Earnshaw | November 29, 2011 - 2:43pm
"I'm a well-to-do guy," he said. "I'm not trying to save $100 (on a fishing license)." A 1%'er ??
by zidar | November 29, 2011 - 1:42pm
I assume Mr. Bartel has a drivers license. You can only have one. Which state issued his? Where is he registered to vote? Where did the census count him?
by TheChemist | November 29, 2011 - 8:38pm
Well...legally. But if you lose your ADL and get a second one, then find the first....not that I have done that, but it is an interesting intellectual question.
by beentheredonethat | November 29, 2011 - 10:23am
It's a sad day when the State Troopers spend so much time on such a weak case. Medred's point on locals complaining about nonresident sport harvest sadly illustrates that AK isn't much ahead of any other State in intelligence. Some seven billion pounds of fish are caught annually in AK. Most of it is exported, and likely less than one tenth of one percent is attributed to nonresident anglers.
by OldHat | November 30, 2011 - 5:45pm
Location, Location, Location. As a realtor, Bartell would have learned this, as surely as almost everyone else does at least by the age they can seek a drivers license. Most locations where fish are to be had and are easily (and many not so easily) accessible have heavy completion for them. The “seven billion pounds of fish ... caught annually in AK” observation is ... ah ... red herring. There is endless contention about all those fish and the amount available for sport and personal use is a small fraction of the 7 billion pounds.
by Lifer | November 29, 2011 - 10:28am
Why don't the troopers investigate these non-resident fish and game board members? Should be easy to to find out if they have received PFD checks or not. If they didn't, they aren't residents and are therefore ineligible.
by anchskier | November 29, 2011 - 10:47am
You can't just judge by the PFD. It has different stipulations to residency and not all who are residents even apply for or otherwise don't qualify for the PFD. Yes, all PFD recipients should (I say "should" because there is some amount of fraud happening) be residents, but not all residents get a PFD.
by sierraseven | November 29, 2011 - 6:48pm
Very true. Some Alaskans who are valid residents in every way don't agree that the dividend program is the best use of the funds - and thus, putting their money where their mouths are, don't apply for the dividend check. Residence is a requirement for a PFD - but not receiving a PFD is NOT evidence that a person is not a resident.
by akconstant | November 29, 2011 - 9:18am
"Bartell said he wouldn't take the money because he's not trying to take things from Alaska." You can't eat money Bartell. But taking fish in this manner is stealing if you don't live here.
by isnarewolves | November 29, 2011 - 9:16am
nick yurko newest board of game appointy (not confirmed yet)also has a long history of spending his winters outside.
by randyk43 | November 28, 2011 - 11:11pm
This whole article was for the one liner jab at Palin! She is gone Medred! Quit reliving the past!
by Lifer | November 29, 2011 - 10:19am
If Karl Johnstone can spend the winter in Arizona and serve on the Board of Fish, why can't this guy dip salmon? |













Comments