Alaska's sport halibut catch drops once again
Craig Medred |
Oct 24, 2011
Finally, the results are in for 2010, and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game says halibut anglers -- both guided and unguided -- under-harvested once again. They were projected to catch slightly more than 7.6 million pounds of halibut statewide in 2010, but actually caught slightly less than 6.3 million pounds, according to Fish and Game, which put the actual harvest 17 percent below the expected. The biggest drops came in harvests by unguided anglers. They were projected to catch about 2.1 million pounds of halibut in the north Gulf of Alaska area 3A -- primarily around Homer, Seward and Valdez -- but caught only 1.6 million pounds, about 31 percent less. Results in Southeast, area 2C, were similar. Unguided anglers projected to catch 2.1 million pounds in area 2C caught only about 900,000 pounds. Charter angler catches in both areas were about 10 percent behind projections with the 2C catch at 1.1 million pounds and the 3A catch at 2.7 million pounds. The commercial catch off Alaska in 2010 was about 40 million pounds. And it is calculated another 10.5 million pounds of halibut -- more than twice the charter sport catch for the year -- were caught in commercial fisheries and dumped back into the ocean dead. The state's analysis of the 2010 sport catch comes at a time of chaos in the halibut fisheries. The Fisheries Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) earlier this year eliminated about 30 percent of the working Alaska charter halibut fleet with a limited-entry scheme. Before the consequences of that restriction were even known, NOAA bowed to the requests the commercial-fisheries run North Pacific Fisheries Management Council (NPFMC) and proposed a "catch share plan'' to force halibut charter business to share the pain of declining halibut numbers. The International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), a treaty organization that oversees management of Pacific Ocean halibut for the U.S. and Canadian governments, says the biomass in the ocean has been declining because the fish don't grow nearly as fast as they once did. "For the past 15 years or so,'' the commission says, "halibut growth rates have been depressed to levels that haven't been seen since the 1920s....Sometime aorund 1980, growth rates started to drop, and now Alaska halibut of a a given age and sex are about the same size as they were in the 1920s. For example, in the northern Gulf of Alaska, an 11-year-old female halibut weighed about 20 pounds in the 1920s, nearly 50 pounds in the 1970s, and now again about 20 pounds.'' Because of the declining size of the fish, the commission has ordered catch cutbacks to protect vital spawners. Female halibut don't usually start spawning until they are 10 or 12 years old. Why the fish are growing so slowly remains a mystery, although the commission says the issue "may be tied to increased abundance of other species, such as arrowtooth flounder, and availability of food supply.''
by grabber5 | October 25, 2011 - 4:52pm
and griles, anything Medred writes is biased. He is not a reporter, he is a schill for the charter industry.
by grabber5 | October 25, 2011 - 4:49pm
The sport card isn't my idea. It has been recommended to the state and IPHC and has not been adopted. Apparently, the sport division of the department has some kind of issue. As for the state constitution, halibut is not a state resource, but a federal. You know what that means? It means that legally someone who lives in a condo in Florida has just as much right to the resource as somebody who lives in Homer or Petersburg. A peanut farmer in Alabama has as much right to the resource as a life long resident of the state of Alaska. The IFQ quotas are and were based on the group that was using the resource. Guided sport is a johnny come lately that wants an open ended harvest. That being said, guided fishing still has a right to some of the resource, but it needs to be regulated, counted, and have a ceiling just like the ifq guys. I am an ifq holder, and I think it is shameful that there is by-catch and waste in the cod long-line and trawl fisheries, and it should be eliminated. Face it, this is a resource that everybody wants. To manage it correctly and responsibly, every pound, no matter who catches it needs to be counted. Once every user group is accounted for, we can get down to dividing it up.
by griles | October 25, 2011 - 9:22am
Man, this article reeks of bias. It's well-researched, but the author just couldn't help coloring every sentence against commercial and toward sport fishermen. The Dispatch should do better.
by beentheredonethat | October 25, 2011 - 9:40am
Yup, the truth is tough to swallow, but about time.
by tiglax | October 25, 2011 - 8:06am
The State of Alaska Constitution says that the resources of the state belong to the people, ALL the people. Therefor sport and personal use (self-harvest)should take precedence over commercial. The real tragedy is the bycatch waste, high end fish thrown overboard because the fish bureaucracy chooses to ignore the issue. A plan is floating around wherein trawl bycatch is kept aboard and delivered for sale. The trawlers get reimbursed some expenses. The rest of the money (most of it) goes to commercial halibut IFQ holders, divided according to their quota share that year. Then the bycatch pounds sold from the previous year become part of the next year's halibut TAC. Theoretically this would add 10.5 million pounds back into the TAC, shared between commercial and sport fisherman. Yes? King Salmon bycatch among the pollack trawl fleet has been recognized and curtailed this year. Halibut needs to next. It is just plain stupid to throw the halibut bycatch overboard!
by grabber5 | October 25, 2011 - 6:20am
The sport catch to which you refer is the result of ADF&G's creel survery. It is an estimate. The commercial sector has recommended that the state have a report card for all sport halibut fishermen, guided, non-guided, resident and non. It could charge a nominal fee for administration costs, and it would be submitted to the state at the end of the season. You would have to have it on your person while fishing, and if you retained halibut, write the date length of the fish on the card. If you did not submit your card at the end of the season they could fine or take away your privileges or something along those lines.
by beentheredonethat | October 25, 2011 - 9:46am
Hey, this is my idea, too! I dunno about the commercial fishing hard numbers though....personal use fish snuck home or crucified halibut toss overboard or yelloweyes floating away at night are not counted.
by tiglax | October 25, 2011 - 8:16am
The sport harvest card that you propose is a very good idea. It is done now with King Salmon and could be implemented in the same way with halibut. Hard numbers would then be available from both sides. Right now guided halibut businesses are required to log their daily catches. The bigger question is why, using rough figures from Medred above, the sport catch is only 10% of the commercial catch? Who determined that split and when? There are many, many more sport fishermen than commercial. Let's revisit that equation while we also deal with halibut bycatch. |













Comments