Corey Rossi replacement must be dedicated to science-based management
Kris Hundertmark |
Feb 11, 2012
By now, the resignation of Corey Rossi from the position of Director of Wildlife Conservation (DWC) at the Alaska Department of Fish and Game is old news to most Alaskans. The news may have dropped from the headlines, but should not be out of mind. The task of selecting a director to lead one of the most respected wildlife agencies in the country continues. Alaskans should understand that, although Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) Commissioner Cora Campbell recently appointed ADF&G Special Assistant Doug Vincent-Lang as acting DWC director, she is still recruiting for a permanent director. They also should understand that the choice is an important one -- for the future of Fish and Game and for all Alaskans. The director holds considerable influence over wildlife management and has the potential to affect all who value and depend on the diversity and abundance of Alaska’s wildlife resources. As the only professional organization of wildlife biologists in the state, the Alaska Chapter of The Wildlife Society promotes the training of wildlife managers in the sciences and the application of science in wildlife management. It was with this focus in mind that the Alaska Chapter sent a letter last month to Commissioner Campbell asking her to carefully select a new director who would value science above political considerations. A little history might help explain: In 1933, Aldo Leopold, one of the founders of modern wildlife management, wrote that managing wildlife for sustainable harvest was an art achieved through its practitioners’ knowledge of the land. Almost 80 years later, there is still an element of art to wildlife management, especially when managers must seek a balance among competing demands for wildlife resources. Since Leopold’s era, however, science has played an increasingly important role in our field. Training in ecology, genetics, physiology, mathematics and other related disciplines provide the many and varied skills wildlife managers must bring to the job to make sound and objective decisions. It is from this perspective that we offered our view to the Commissioner on the necessary qualifications for the next director. In our opinion, management of Alaska’s wildlife must be based in science to be successful. We acknowledge that social, political, and economic realities must also be taken into consideration. However, it is critical that knowledge gained through science form the basis for management decisions; failure to do so too often results in ineffective or ill-guided programs that waste effort and money. Choosing a director who is an experienced professional dedicated to science-based wildlife management will ensure ADF&G staff can objectively conduct research and management activities without the undue influence of politics. This will allow ADF&G biologists to openly collaborate with biologists in other agencies and academic institutions, freely communicate their findings and incorporate the best science available into their management recommendations. Technical expertise is also an important qualification for the next director. The director should have sufficient training and professional experience to advise and interact with state and other biologists at a scientific level, to understand the basis of their recommendations and to accurately communicate state findings to others. Demonstrated leadership, professional integrity, and organizational competence are essential skills for the next director to be effective. The director will lead a staff of highly trained and dedicated wildlife biologists to whom professional ethics and integrity are important. They should have a leader of equal caliber that will demand and demonstrate high professional standards. We Alaskans deeply value our wildlife resources. Those resources also provide important and sustainable economic worth to our economy. In order to maintain those resources, it is vital that the Director of Wildlife Conservation be dedicated to science-based management, have the technical competence to direct science and management programs, and demonstrate a level of integrity equal to that of the Division’s staff. We strongly encourage all Alaskans to insist on those characteristics in our wildlife leaders and to call for a curbing of politically-driven appointments at Fish and Game. The State and its wildlife deserve no less. Kris Hundertmark, Ph.D, is president of the Alaska Chapter of The Wildlife Society. The views expressed here are the writer's own and are not necessarily endorsed by Alaska Dispatch. Alaska Dispatch welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, e-mail commentary(at)alaskadispatch.com.
by Bretta | February 12, 2012 - 10:02pm
The "abundance manager" was a fake position filled by a fraud. Just get rid of the position.
by gpearston | February 12, 2012 - 1:09pm
Funny how NOW they have the requirements right. What happened when it was Rossi's turn to apply? This whole thing is pretty sad. Leave the politics out of Fish and Game or if they can't do that they should at least do a good job.
by Aleut Granddaughter | February 12, 2012 - 11:46am
Deer in the headlights Campbell - I hope she has it in her to perform an interview. No one has any trust in her except her handlers. If you want to see eyes roll, mention her name to someone in her dept. She's a very big, and sad, joke. I don't know how she walks in the door every morning, she is not respected one bit. There are people in the Dept who could run circles around Corri or his temp - however I doubt they want to have anything to do with the crappy politics going on now. The other day when I saw one of my long time ADF&G guys, I asked him how it was going and he looked at me and said "I'm just waiting to retire". That broke my heart - years and years and years of excellent service to ADF&G and no one cares anymore. Cora's ridiculous appointment was the final straw for many. Palin/Parnell have done serious damage to this Dept.
by Joe Geldhof | February 12, 2012 - 9:30am
Certainly retaining an individual with skills and integrity is important when it comes to managing wildlife resources. But is this not true for all government service? Alaska has been sliding down a path of cronyism and appointment of pals and folks without regard to a demonstrated ability to get the job done for the public for years. Our oil wealth has allowed politicians to ignore meritorious appointments in many instances. Rossi was one in a long line of feather merchants appointed to public office based on who he knew, not what he knew or with skills to get the job done. |













Comments