Fast Internet essential to all of rural Alaska
Jason Evans | The Arctic Sounder |
Dec 23, 2011
Recently, The Arctic Sounder's staff was relying more than ever on modern technology to get the paper out. The only difference was our staff was more spread out than normal. Carey Restino, the Arctic Sounder editor, had spent several days in Kotzebue, which allowed her to go snowmachining out in a storm, attend school functions and Christmas bazaars, and taste some traditional Eskimo food like whale, seal and caribou. Meantime, our reporter Hannah Heimbuch was in Hawaii traveling with family, but still reporting on news in the Arctic. At 11 p.m. on deadline day, the paper gets laid out electronically on a MacBook that one week can be in Anchorage, next in Homer, and the next week in Kotzebue. It all works, but each photo and story being e-mailed or uploaded to the server is taking much longer than normal. This shows how rural Alaska needs high-speed broadband more than ever. Our citizens and businesses rely on broadband Internet to work. Internet throughout rural Alaska is all provided by satellite with slow and limited download and upload speeds. Not only is the Internet slow, but it's expensive for commercial providers to buy the bandwidth needed. It is also limited. This satellite-only service will change for part of rural Alaska when 65 communities throughout western Alaska are connected through GCI's TERRA network shortly after the New Year. TERRA stands for "Terrestrial for Every Region of Rural Alaska" and is made up of 470-plus miles of microwave towers as high as 250 feet and fiber optic cable under water and buried on the tundra, which will connect these communities. Much of this project is funded by federal dollars mainly coming from the 2009 American Recovery and Investment Act where GCI was awarded $44 million in loans and $44 million in grants for a total of $88 million. Once activated, this terrestrial network will provide Internet speeds equal to those in urban Alaska, connecting 9,000 rural Alaska households and nearly 750 businesses. But none of these communities are in the Northwest Arctic or the North Slope. Worse yet, there is no clear way to fund high speed broadband to connect our regions. We are essentially left out. High speed broadband is not just for YouTube and Facebook. It carries voice, data and video. The uses are endless, just as we depend on it to develop our community newspapers. But beyond our own needs, the world in which we live is increasingly operating on the assumption that everyone in it has access to high Internet speeds. Documents are larger, and video is used more often, not just for recreational purposes, but for essential services like job applications to state and federal agencies, tax forms, and even health records. Modes of communication such as Skype are virtually impossible using these connections, but are more and more commonly used. Even worse, constant outages limit essential access to audio feeds for public hearings and other government processes. Distance delivery education is limited as well by these slow connections, limiting future generations, too. Perhaps the lawmakers who are charged with making the decisions about appropriating money toward bridging the digital divide should come to Kotzebue or Barrow for a day and try to do business there with their laptops. I guarantee the first time someone sends them a large document, their productivity will slow to a halt while they wait and wait and wait. It's true that the Northwest Arctic is remote and proves a challenge for those trying to figuring out a way to speed things up, but it is essential and requires the attention and creative thinking of our elected officials and law-makers to find a solution to that challenge. Otherwise, current and future generations will fall behind. Jason Evans is the owner and publisher of The Arctic Sounder, where the preceding commentary first appeared. It is republished here with permission. The views expressed here are the writer's own and are not necessarily endorsed by Alaska Dispatch. Alaska Dispatch welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, e-mail commentary(at)alaskadispatch.com.
by arcticracer | December 24, 2011 - 11:47am
On October 27th of this year the FCC announced sweeping changes to the subsidy mechanism that supports telecommunications in Alaska and other areas of the US that are underserved. It's called the Universal Service Fund. Things are going to get a whole lot leaner and money will be much harder to find. It is incredibly expensive to provide telephone service in the bush, even more expensive to deliver broadband. Unless the FCC comes up with an Alaskan specific plan to improve access to broadband, it will be impossible to expand service or even to complete projects already underway under the newly enacted regulations. Alaska has been inserted into a one size fits all plan that covers the entire country. I hope nobody is surprised that yes, phone and internet is heavily subsidized throughout rural Alaska, like almost every other facet of life there. Housing, medical care, telephone and internet, fuel, electricity, mail service, on and on... Taxpayers are tired of it.
by nsfhi | December 26, 2011 - 12:54am
And so are rural areas tired of urban areas be subsidized in tune of billions from rural resources. I hope nobody is surprised that hydroelectric, coal plants have all been subsidized by rural money. What does Anchorage produce? If it produces nothing than where does it get its money? Anchorages Airport? Alaskan Railroad? Did the citizens float bonds for those projects? To get a port in Nome we needed to float a bond with NOAA support which we are paying back. Get real urban road system taxpayer.
by sierrahotel | December 24, 2011 - 10:57am
No one forced you to live someplace where "modern" amenities don't exist. If you want it, pay for it. If it's not available, learn to do it another way. What you're really saying is that high speed broadband is a basic human right, and you want someone else to pay for it. I hate to break this to you, but Life's not fair - get over it.
by nsfhi | December 26, 2011 - 12:59am
I hate to break it to you. You didn't work for what you got, you didn't own the resource and weren't even close to it. You used the power of the US Supreme court to steal the taxes on rural resources, "One man One Vote" Otherwise you wouldn't have the arrogant attitude you have. Life isn't fair and rural areas are fighting back. You will have to start working for your stuff.
by gmoore70 | December 24, 2011 - 3:46pm
Broadband is basic economic infrastructure. No successful business today operates without the services provided by broadband. The global market in which most businesses aim to succeed requires broadband. So here is the deal. Rural Alaska will provide access to the minerals, oil, natural gas, timber, fisheries, water, and labor which sustain urban Alaska. In turn, urban Alaska will provide the economic infrastructure chosen by rural Alaska to best suit their own desired economic development. Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau would not exist without their economic exchange with rural Alaska. It is high time for parity in that economic exchange.
by Frumious | December 24, 2011 - 5:03pm
Quote: "Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau would not exist without their economic exchange with rural Alaska. It is high time for parity in that economic exchange." Nonsense. No offense gmoore, but Rural Alaska (with a capital letter R) has no standing/is not a player at the table of the development of natural resources in rural Alaska (small r) unless the resources are owned by Native Alaska's (capital letters) regional corporations. If they are so owned (as in the case of the Donlin Creek Gold Mine or the Tek-Cominco mine near Kotz), then the financial resources exist to install and support infrastructure to develop these world-class resources. And the benefits are shared with Rural Alaskan (caps) villages thanks to the terms of the Alaska Native Land Claims Settlement Act which shares 70% of the profits of Alaska's natural resources on Native land with Native Alaskans through the regional corporations (but not with non-native Alaskans).
by gmoore70 | December 25, 2011 - 10:48am
Your state and federal government leaders, regardless of party, and most Alaska citizens recognize rural Alaska as a significant opportunity for investment in economic infrastructure, regardless of the resource owner. When rural Alaska's economy rises, no matter the owner of the resource, economic data show all boats in the state float higher due to collateral economic development. Governor Parnell has proposed substantial studies of road development in rural Alaska. It will become the rural boroughs' job to ensure that DOT treats those roads as utilidors to include, not just the road, but also rail, power, regional NG pipe, cell towers, and optical fiber. It will also become the rural boroughs' job to insist on appropriate utilidor construction, in keeping with regional goals. Mr. Evans' editorial is spot on, and about to be fulfilled. And there will be no end to more editorials on development from Arctic Sounder: a good and timely investment by Mr. Evans.
by Freshwrestler | December 24, 2011 - 6:14pm
I love capitalism. |













Comments