Former Palin aide Bailey fined nearly $12,000 for insider emails in his book
Amanda Coyne |
Feb 21, 2012
The Anchorage Daily News is reporting that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin aide Frank Bailey has agreed to pay a fine of $11,900 for violating the state’s ethics laws for writing a book that is heavily centered on emails that were sent during the time Bailey was in state office. The fine is a result of a settlement between Bailey and the Alaska Department of Law. Although Bailey had given the department a copy of the book before it was published, he apparently left in emails that he was told to keep out of the final manuscript. The fine was the result of a complaint filed by watchdog Andree McLeod, a one-time friend of Palin's who has filed numerous ethical complaints against the former governor and state officials. The complaint alleged Bailey had used and profited from inside information by using emails in his 2011 book about his time in the Palin administration. "State employees know not to do this -- from commissioners on down to the admin clerk, they know you can't personally benefit form information acquired when you're working for the state,” she told the Daily News. The book, "Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin," was published by an imprint of Simon & Schuster. Largely centered around Bailey’s time as Palin’s trusted adviser, its narrative relies heavily on emails sent between Bailey and Palin. There have been at least a few books written about Palin’s time as governor, but none as intimate -- because of those emails and because of Bailey’s close relationship to Palin-- as "Blind Allegiance." In addition to Bailey, the book had two other authors: Los Angeles, Calif., author Ken Morris and Anchorage's Jeanne Devon, the founder and editor of the popular political blog Mudflats. However, it’s told in the first person and follows Bailey through Palin adulation to Palin dissolution -- dissolution largely justified through those emails, many of which follow what Bailey perceived as unethical machinations. Such machinations included an illegal coordination with the National Governors Association -- headed at the time by Mitt Romney -- to produce Palin campaign commercials, and unethical actions by both the Alaska governor and her husband Todd related to the scandal known in Alaska as “Troopergate.” But perhaps more damning were the emails detailing intimate information about Palin’s turbulent home life and the fact that she was looking for justification to quit her job before she did so in 2009. No matter the explosive material, the book suffered in sales in large part due to the fact that the rough draft of the manuscript was leaked before publication by author Joe McGinniss, who had moved next door to Palin and was also writing a book about her. This is how the New York Times described McGinniss' book: (D)ated, petty and easily available to anyone with Internet access, Mr. McGinniss used his time in Alaska to chase caustic, unsubstantiated gossip about the Palins, often from unnamed sources like 'one resident' and 'a friend.'" Contact Amanda Coyne at Amanda@alaskadispatch.com
by NorthStar | February 22, 2012 - 6:34pm
Re-reading the book right now; one of my personal favorites. The trolls are certainly out tonight. Obviously it's not fake, the e-mails are things that Palin actually wrote so you can't just say it's a piece of fiction. He would not have been fined if it wasn't legitimate.
by Funwithliberals | February 22, 2012 - 11:44am
Most of what is said about Sarah Palin is unsubstantiated gossip. Her irrational haters couldn't name person who is really in the know if they had a phonebook containing every Alaskan resident and super powers. They're that delusional.
by MissMuffet | February 22, 2012 - 9:34am
The Times summed up this bizarre period well enough. You can't get much better than "unsubstantiated gossip", just facefood for a Harlequin contract.
by Mae | February 22, 2012 - 7:13am
Bailey told his journey with Alaska's Worst Governor Ever via Blind Allegiance. Oddly enough, the public was able to see some of those "open and transparent" Palin e-mails through Bailey's journey. Meanwhile being able to view a bulk of the e-mails from the Palin administration is like trying to pull a tooth from a moose. All this still begs the question: What is the problem with releasing all the Palin (and her administration) e-mails? What is the real issue with those e-mails? It doesn't seem like its the Alaskan public, whom Palin was elected to serve. Alaska's 1st Woman Governor is Alaska's Worst Governor Ever. My favorite part of Bailey's book, was how they manipulated polls (and eventually the media) to shed a positive light on Palin. Alaska went through some confusing, caustic times when Palin campaigned. At that time I voted dem, because Palin didn't express her policy views. I wanted more than bumper sticker speak and it was a easy for me to choose who would provide a public service for Alaska. Bailey's book confirmed a lot of what my gut was telling me. Was Bailey wrong to use e-mails from his state job? Yes, according to APOC. However I appreciate the fact that he was able to express his journey. I enjoy political history. It stems from having the opportunity to yell at Hammond as a young voter (we did eventually speak in normal tones). Bailey's book is more of a personal political history. Unlike Crude Awakening, which, of course is not a personal journey, yet totally enjoyable. Bailey's book will go down, as part of the story, that is Alaska's political history. And it sure isn't written in "bumper sticker speak".
by jimbehlke | February 23, 2012 - 10:56am
This fine was probably a decision made under the Executive Branch Ethics Act, AS 39.52, or under other parts of AS 39 including personnel rules in which case this email issue would not have been under APOC jurisdiction. There are 3 EBEA Personnel Board members who are appointed (ironically) by the governor; Debra English, Keith Hamilton, and Alfred Tamagni, Sr. Julia Bockman in the Department of Law has been the State's EBEA oversight person. Close as I can tell, Tamagni was appointed by Murkowski in March of 2006; English was reappointed by Palin in 2008, and Hamilton was appointed by Parnell in 2010. Are these the folks who decided to fine Bailey? If so, a majority of the board are apparently Palin/ Parnell appointees. That's my guess but I'm not sure. Perhaps Bailey and Bockman negotiated. This is all confusing to me-- there may be at least 6 different ethics oversight entities in the State of Alaska-- legislative ethics, executive branch ethics, judicial ethics, APOC, legislative impeachment, and the Department of Law itself. |














Comments