Halibut charter skippers organize against federal fishery quotas
Craig Medred |
Aug 11, 2011
Glenn Merrill is unlikely to get a warm welcome in the usually friendly Alaska tourist town of Homer on Friday, unless sitting in the hot-seat qualifies. Who, you ask, is Glenn Merrill? He is the assistant regional administrator for the National Marine Fisheries Service, which has proposed a "halibut catch sharing plan" that Homer charter operators say is likely to bankrupt them. The plan would guarantee a comparative handful of commercial fishermen about 85 percent of the halibut catch in Southcentral Alaska for perpetuity. The charter skippers -- who form the backbone of the Homer tourism business -- would be forced to make do with the other 15 percent. Merrill is due in Homer for a Friday evening meeting to explain to locals the need for the plan. The Alaska Charter Association set the stage for his arrival earlier this week by charging that the proposal, as now written, will force a reduction in next year's halibut bag limit down to one fish. The charter association doesn't expect many anglers to be willing to spend more than $150 on a charter for the chance to catch one fish, down from the limit of two. And doing business is only going to get harder if there is a size limit on that one fish. That is a possibility. Charter operators in Southeast Alaska are already laboring under a limit of one fish less than 37 inches.
If the size limit comes into play for Cook Inlet, the 25-year-old Homer Jackpot Halibut Derby -- Alaska's best-known fishing tournament -- will be toast. That would be a blow for the Homer Chamber of Commerce, which each year nets more than 20 percent of its funding from the derby. Worse, though, would be the general impact on the community's economy, which lives or dies on the tourism business fishing attracts to the Spit that juts out from Homer into Kachemak Bay near the south end of the Kenai Peninsula, about 250 road miles from Anchorage. Fish thief Arne Fuglvog supported halibut charter restrictionsAll of this is thanks to Arne Fuglvog and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, according to charter boat skipper Rex Murphy of Anchorage. A former leader of the politically powerful Petersburg Vessel Owners Association, Fuglvog was on the council when it began plotting ways to freeze the catch of halibut by charter boats and anglers. Small-time sport fishermen were seen as competitors for a public resource that had been awarded largely to commercial longliners through what were called "individual fishing quotas." The longliners argued restrictions on the charter business were only fair. They noted the total halibut catch for the Pacific Ocean is capped by the International Pacific Halibut Commission for conservation purposes. If charter catches were allowed to grow, they said, the commercial catch would need to be reduced to keep the total catch within conservation limits. And that, the longliners said, would result in the charter industry taking away halibut that longliners were owed under the quota program. Fuglvog, who was appointed to the council by former Gov. Frank Murkowski, was a longliner at the time the discussion started. He subsequently left the council in 2006 to go to work in Washington, D.C., as the fisheries aid to Sen. Lisa Murkowski. She was appointed to the seat by her father, who had resigned as Alaska's senator after being elected governor. Fuglvog's role as Lisa Murkowski's fisheries adviser put him into an even better position to influence Alaska fishery policy than he had on the North Pacific Management Council.
by sourdoughmel | October 11, 2011 - 1:21pm
It looks to me like everyone affected by the halibut sharing program on a local scale should join the "Alaska Charter Assoc." The sport fisheries are one step up from personal use and anyone interested in protecting their right to our resources really need to help the Charter industry to fight for their very existence. This means all people benefiting from the sale of charter caught fish, right up to the restaurants that sell food to the charter customers or the taxi that takes them to and from the airport, etc, etc. Money is power and the charter industry needs money to fight for their rights. Any one that is ever going to be interested in fishing in Alaska needs to wake up, this rule would affect everyone in the future. The big crime here is a 45% by catch from just one trawl boat last week. One hundred ton waste!!!
by TRAILHEAD | August 23, 2011 - 11:33pm
grabber5 Sting operations on charters? Like the agents buying fishing packages with our tax dollars to prosecute grandpa for handing his rod to his grandson to finish reeling in his fish. Big fine for "proxy fishing" imposed on the lodge and skipper, nothing like the commercials wake full of bellyside-up halibut that aren't keepers. Get real.
by COOKWNJ1948 | August 23, 2011 - 5:08am
THERE IS NO WAY ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WILL COME TO ALASKA FROM THE LOWER '48 SPENDING THOUSANDS OF $$$$ FOR ONE HALIBUT.IF THIS LAW IS PASSED IT WILL PUT COUNTLESS CHARTER FISHERMEN OUT OF BUSINESS AND IN THIS ECONOMY YOU WANT TO BE CREATING JOBS NOT ELIMINATING THEM.POLITICANS BETTER GET THEIR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT. THE ENTIRE TOURIST TRADE WILL SUFFER AND EFFECTIVELY KILL THE COMMUNITY IN THE HOMER COOK INLET AREA. THE DOMINO EFFECT WILL TAKE PLACE ON BUSNESSES THAT SUPPORT THE FISHING INDUSTRY;LODGING,FOOD & RESTURANTS,SPORTING GOODS,SPECIALTY SHOPS ETC.
by grabber5 | August 14, 2011 - 6:12am
I guess you could say Craig is honest and direct, in a biased sort of way. First of all Arne never was the head of PVOA, a member yes, but only that. Funny, the commercial side gets one crook, it is a major media event. Sting operations are conducted on charter businesses, with major and extreme violations, you hardly hear of it. Craig Medred is an anti-commercial fishing schill for the Charter industry.
by beentheredonethat | August 14, 2011 - 9:29am
This crook just happened to be an upstanding member of the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council and be Murkowski's Fish Advisor, making alot of political rulings!
by SPECKLEFOOT | August 12, 2011 - 7:19pm
Way to go, charter captains! It's not your piddly use of the fishery that causes the problems. Take F&G and the commercial fishermen to task. They are just being facilitators and pigs, respectively.
by beentheredonethat | August 12, 2011 - 10:47am
No comments from the commercial fishing sector? I just read another article mentioning the charter harvest always exceeding their GHL in Southeast Alaska. And still, no mention of the 62 million pounds of halibut the IPHC Commissioners allowed the commercial longliners to harvest, above the biological sustainable level, from 2001 to 2010. No wonder halibut stocks are low in Area 2C!
by nemcw | August 13, 2011 - 10:17pm
Not sure where area 2C maybe, but the story is about South Central, Cook Inlet and the Gulf of Alaska. This debate, out of Homer, may be a precurser to others around the State. But unless Alaska fishers can effectiely use whatever clout they think they have in DC to stay the implementation of these plans, they have only themselves to blame.
by Concerned Alaskan | August 12, 2011 - 8:18am
As usual, Craig is honest and direct! One critical comment must be made. Yes, the North Council is a federal level council, but they are state appointed ( 3-from Washinton, and 7-from Alaska). Governor Palin and Parnell received letters fom Washinton D.C. urging them to nominate a more balanced council composition ( the ACA has copies of those letters). Both refused to comply, clearly yielding to obligations from campaign promises and contributions from commercial fishing groups (not all Alaskan). Governor Parnell has created the worst fisheries council in the country, and also nominated a commercial fisheries person to be commissioner of Fish and Game. He is in the commercial fishing fold and has sold out Alaskans! Thus, everything created by this council is anti-sport and pro commercial!
by takatz | August 12, 2011 - 9:14pm
All of the charter/longline fight is dumb, dumb dumb. Anybody ever heard of trawling in the Gulf? Longliners and charter fishermen fighting each other while all this trawling goes on is just what big industry wants. Let the small entrepreneurs, comemercial and charter, fight for the scraps while you toss out the cream dragging for garbage. we have met the enemy, and it is ...
by nemcw | August 13, 2011 - 10:20pm
Good for you "takatz". We might even save the Yukon River salmon runs if we looked way more closely at the trawls. |














Comments