International Pacific Halibut Commission hearings open in Anchorage
Craig Medred |
Jan 23, 2012
With one of the world's valuable fisheries in a state of flux and fishermen at war, the International Pacific Halibut Commission convenes in Anchorage Tuesday to start a week of discussions on the fate of the big flatfish of the North Pacific. At root, the problem facing the commission -- not to mention commercial, sport and subsistence halibut fishermen from the Bering Sea south all the way to California -- is simple: Not enough big fish to meet everyone's desires. By and large, the halibut managed by the joint U.S.-Canada treaty organization are doing fine. There are plenty of fish, but most of them are now under 32 inches in length. Too small for the commercial halibut fishery, and even too small for many anglers. Most want halibut 15 pounds and up. The average 32-incher weighs a little less than that. More important, though, those 32-inch-plus fish constitute what the commission calls the "exploitable biomass" estimated at 317 million pounds last year. It is now believed to be down to 260 million pounds, a drop of 18 percent in a single year. This would not be alarming except for the fact that halibut from 32 inches up constitute the spawning population. The smaller, more plentiful halibut are sexually immature and incapable of reproducing. The commission needs to keep fishermen from catching too many of the adult fish until the younger fish mature, or the halibut population could crash. Everyone agrees that would be a bad thing, but with the commission talking of drastic harvest cuts, there is plenty of fear about jobs. Commission scientists have suggested a 20 percent reduction in the catch may be necessary. That could force new restrictions on anglers and further reduce the halibut fleet and the shore-based processors that service the commercial fishermen. For years, the industry has been reeling from a slow but steady decline in halibut numbers and a big increase in consolidation of individual fishing quotas. One commission report notes that when the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council led the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration into privatizing the fishery back in 1995, there were 2,206 boats actively fishing in Alaska, and 4,831 fishermen were given quota shares based on their past participation in the halibut fishery. Many of those fishermen promptly cashed out of the fishery by privately selling their shares in what is still considered a publicly owned resource. According to the commission report, there are now only 2,740 quota holders -- a drop of 43 percent. Meanwhile, the number of boats fishing fell to 1,286 this year -- a decrease of 42 percent since 1995. How this affects jobs is hard to say for certain. Individual, small-boat fishermen have been fading away, replaced by skippers with bigger boats and crews. The crews take up some of the jobs that once went to independent fishermen, but between the consolidation and reductions in harvest everyone agrees jobs have been leaking away in the commercial fishery. The response has been for commercial fishermen to try to get the North Pacific Council, a body controlled by commercial fishing interests, to take fish away from charter boat operators to give to the commercial fishery. The commercial fishermen contend it isn't fair that the charter boats continue to operate under a fixed, guideline harvest while the catch limit for the commercial fishery keeps falling along with the shrinking halibut stock. The commission reports an Alaska commercial catch for 2011 at 31.6 million pounds, still much more than the 5.9-million-pound sport catch. Charter anglers landed about 60 percent of that. And the sport catch was significantly less than the estimated 10 million pounds of halibut the commission says was caught and discarded dead by trawlers mining the Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska for Pollock and perch. It was noted in commission reports, however, that the bycatch was "a 6 percent decrease from 2010 and the lowest since 1986."
by jennyb47 | January 25, 2012 - 10:00am
Commercial fishing is a volume business that sells for profit the caught fish, crab or whatever. To me guided sport fishing is a business owned and operated by a private, licensed boat operator. This provides the opportunity for a recreational, sportfishing person to catch their own fish. If it's not considered sportfishing then why are the catch limits part of the Alaska Sportfishing Regulations?
by AKsmokesalmon | January 24, 2012 - 4:57pm
Regarding the charter operators who take clients to fish for halibut, as of 2011 every charter in Alaska is now required to have a charter halibut moritorium permit. About one-third of the charter operators did not qualify for a charter moratorium permit. On another note, some people seem to have a bit of confusion regarding the term "commercial". Commercial fishermen are part of the seafood industry, and harvesters sell fish to processors, who then process fish and sell wholesale to retail markets. Charter operators are part of the recreational industry, and charters are paid to guide anglers while fishing. Guides sell the opportunity to anglers to catch fish. Sport caught fish cannot be sold into the seafood industry channels, such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. Both commercial fishing harvesters / processors and charter operators are for profit business ventures, just in two very different industries. The seafood industry uses about 87% of all halibut harvested in Alaska, while the charter operators use about 7.5%, and the rest being taken by unguided anglers and subsistence users.
by HD907 | January 25, 2012 - 3:40pm
ummmm...in this matter guiding is by definition a commercial enterprise. And, in this case that enterprise is entirely dependent on the availability of fish which are in fact still a public resource, regardless. There is a recognized disconnect between a private person using his own boat to fish and a guiding industry that profits from a resource extraction based enterprise. Your argument is comparable to saying the captain of a trawler is not commercial fishing. Guided halibut fishing and in-river guided fishing are in fact more closely related to commercial fishing than say...a fish processor. In the matter of the fresh water in-river commercial fishing industry in Alaska...well, that's outlawed by Alaska's constitution. So that is an industry operating clearly outside of the law. Salt water fisheries are different for sure but none the less...guided halibut fishing is definitely a commercial fishing enterprise and obviously the time has come when most rational people have quit pretending that it is not. The writing is on the wall with respect to the fresh water in-river commercial fisheries in Alaska too.
by FishinforTuition | January 24, 2012 - 9:12am
So only the Commercial Boys are Pirates? Trophy Hunting Fuglov, Rossi, or Knuteson, it really does not discriminate for our partners in the Pirate State, including ALL sectors, sport, sport commercial, sport criminal, sport commercial criminal, commercial criminal, commercial indiscriminate criminal, subsistance criminal, sport commercial subsistance criminal...the list goes on forever... Trophy Hunting at 31 inches, as also related to the age requirement, for another Trophy Catch. On 9/21/11 Alaska Wildlife Troopers, Ketchikan Post, cited charter captain and Aurora Sportfishing owner Michael Anthony Knuteson, 31, of Ketchikan, for the following: illegally taking halibut for guided sportfish purposes in a manner inconsistent with International Pacific Halibut Commission and National Marine Fisheries Service regulations; aiding in the commission of a client violation by retaining an illegal halibut on a guided trip; possessing a halibut not of legal size; failing to submit sportfish charter logbooks to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game in the time specified; failing to complete sportfish charter logbooks; and transporting on deck four persons under 13 years of age who were not wearing personal floatation devices.
by ragnarock | January 24, 2012 - 7:00am
The two obvious moves that regulators seam to want to avoid, are ending the trawl fishery that endangers everything in the water,and recognizing the charter effort as a commercial fishery so it can go limited entry and be regulated that way,charter boat oporators have ben making boat,house and car payments on the sport limit of their customers for long enough, it is a commercial fisheryand should be regulated as such,.
by AKsmokesalmon | January 24, 2012 - 4:52pm
Read above in terms of halibut moratorium permits and commercial operations.
by HD907 | January 24, 2012 - 1:00pm
Good post. |













Comments