Keystone XL pipeline becomes bargaining chip in payroll tax debate
Gail Russell Chaddock | The Christian Science Monitor |
Dec 10, 2011
President Obama last month moved the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline to the bottom of his agenda. This week House Republicans took action to move it back to the top. The pipeline project, which would connect the tar sands of Canada to oil refineries in Texas, has stirred controversy in some host states, mainly over environmental concerns. Mr. Obama was to decide this month whether to approve it, but the timetable was pushed back a year – after the 2012 election, some note – to study a possible new pipeline route. Now Republicans on Capitol Hill are trying to make the pipeline a card to play in their negotiations with Mr. Obama and Democrats over tax policy. For weeks, Congress has been gridlocked over what to do about expiring tax cuts. Lawmakers have proposed and counterproposed bills that will retain workers' payroll tax "holiday" for another year, as well as extend unemployment benefits. But the two parties remain far apart on how to do that without adding billions of dollars to the federal deficit. Democrats appeared to be winning the public-relations war, though Republican leaders have insisted they do not want to let the tax holiday – worth about $1,000 to the average family – expire on Dec. 31. If Congress doesn’t act, the employee payroll tax jumps back to 6.2 percent, up from a 4.2 percent this year. But Republican leaders are stymied, because of strong disagreement within GOP ranks on how to proceed on this issue. Many rank-and-file conservatives see the current payroll tax cut as not actually a cut, because it requires the US Treasury to make up what taxpayers do not pay in to the main funding stream for Social Security, adding to federal deficits. Fractious GOP caucus meetings had failed to find common ground. But Thursday’s move to include approval of the $7 billion Keystone XL pipeline drew cheers from GOP lawmakers and is rallying conservative support, if only because the pipeline puts Republicans on the side of fighting for jobs, not just protecting millionaires from tax hikes. For weeks, Obama and Democratic leaders have hammered Republicans for refusing to allow a surtax on millionaires and billionaires to pay for these popular measures. It was a matter of simple fairness, they said. Polls showed that voters shared that view, likely to be Exhibit A in Democrats' 2012 campaign to hold the Senate and take back the House. And GOP leaders took note. In a switch, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky last week told his caucus that extending payroll tax cuts was crucial to GOP prospects in 2012. Many rank-and-file Republicans still don’t buy it. But the prospect of a fight with the White House over the oil pipeline is giving House Republicans a new rallying point. Cheers erupted during a private meeting of the House GOP caucus Thursday morning as Speaker John Boehner, adding the pipeline to the GOP plan, called on Republicans to “take the fight” to the president. “The Keystone pipeline project will create tens of thousands of jobs immediately,” said Mr. Boehner afterward. “It's pretty clear that the president has decided to push this decision off for a year, conveniently until after his next election,” he added. “Well, the American people can't wait, as the president said.” In a briefing on Thursday, Obama characterized the speaker’s move as just “wanting to dicker,” to see “what they can extract from us in order to get this done.” “However many jobs might be generated by a Keystone pipeline, they’re going to be a lot fewer than the jobs that are created by extending the payroll tax cut and extending unemployment insurance,” Obama added. The House GOP bill, released Friday, also includes a measure to block a 27 percent cut in payments to doctors who serve Medicare patients, set to begin on Jan. 1. Republicans propose a two-year "doc fix." And it would block new federal regulations to limit toxic emissions from industrial boilers – another measure aimed to win support from conservatives and Democrats from coal states.
by beccadog | December 11, 2011 - 8:26am
The pipeline will contaminate the potable water along its route from Canada to the Gulf Coast. Already, another pipeline carrying coal tar sands has contaminated water in the upper peninsula of Michigan. Alaska is relatively clean, and so many of you may not worry about contaminated water in your state and perhaps, that's part of the reason many of you live where you do. But, those of us already greater potential from fossil fuel related polluted drinking water do not want the corrosive tar sands to corrode the pipes to the Gulf Coast.
by Willie Green | December 11, 2011 - 3:12am
We have ignored the Canadian tar sands as a fossil fuel resource for many decades because they are a very low quality, low-yield method of producing oil. Yes, their are enormous quantities of this crud available that should provide fuel for several generations. But it is much more costly to extract and convert to usable product than the petroleum from traditional resources that we've been consuming for the last century. If the GOP wants to build a pipeline to extract and process this crud, that's fine with me under the following conditions. A) Eliminate the tax loopholes and incentives enjoyed by the Fossil Fuel and Pipeline Industries. Diminishing supplies of easily extractable fossil fuels guarantee that they're going to be vastly profitable anyway. They need to start paying their taxes just like everybody else. B) Pipeline construction and operation must be compliant with environmental standards. There must be regulatory assurance that the groundwater is not contaminated by this crud. C) The GOP must hop aboard Obama's High Speed Rail Initiative. With Oil production shifting to these more costly "unconventional resources", we need more fuel efficient transportation infrastructure to remain competitive in the 21st Century Global Economy. This means restoration and expansion of intercity regional passenger rail service throughout our nation. |













Comments