More details emerge in Fairbanks militia arrests
Patti Epler, Jill Burke |
Mar 26, 2011
Two confidential sources on the payroll of the FBI helped the government make its case against Fairbanks-area militia members who are accused of stockpiling illegal weapons and plotting to kill judges, Alaska State Troopers and others, according to information in federal court records unsealed Friday. Neither source knew the other one was working with investigators, but both began assisting in the investigation last June, according to affidavits filed with the court in order to obtain search warrants earlier this month. One is described as a convicted felon facing new fraud charges who agreed to cooperate in hopes of getting the charges reduced. That informant was an insider, promoted in February to the command staff of the Alaska Peacemakers Militia headed by Fairbanks resident Schaeffer Cox, one of those arrested on numerous federal and state charges. The other is a person with no criminal record but in the affidavit is said to be someone who the defendants approached to buy grenades, silencers and other weapons because he was thought to "be in a position to produce possible weaponry." Some in the militia community have speculated that the weapons supplier might be William Fulton, former owner of the Drop Zone military surplus store on Spenard Road. He abruptly signed over his store to an employee and disappeared a few days after the Fairbanks arrests. Nothing in the affidavit gives any information about Fulton, whether he may be connected to the case, or why he might have vanished. The affidavit says both sources were compensated for their assistance and will continue to be paid. Conversations between the sources and the defendants were audio or video taped with the consent of the informants. Cox, Lonnie Vernon and his wife Karen Vernon, Coleman Barney and his wife Rachel Barney, and Michael Anderson face various state and federal charges in connection with an alleged conspiracy that included plotting to kill judges, an IRS agent and Alaska State Troopers. The group allegedly amassed a large weapons cache that contained automatic weapons, silencers and hand grenades, all of which are illegal, and numerous other high-powered weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition. Indictments filed in federal court and criminal complaints filed in state court shortly after the arrests detailed what authorities believe was a significant threat to law enforcement and court officials who had overseen or otherwise been involved in cases involving Schaeffer Cox and the Vernons. Cox had decided to ignore an order to appear in court on a misdemeanor weapons charge. The Vernons were facing possible foreclosure on their home relating to apparently failing to pay taxes. Cox allegedly hatched a plot to kill state judges, troopers and others if authorities tried to arrest him. The Vernons are accused of separately considering killing the federal judge in their tax case, his family and an IRS agent. The search warrant affidavits tell much of the same story -- how Cox, the Vernons and Coleman Barney went about acquiring myriad weapons they stored at their houses and in a trailer that eventually was left at the Fairbanks Ice Park. The documents make reference to several "militia weapons caches" thought to be located in the Fairbanks area. The confidential source told authorities about "numerous handguns, shotguns and assault rifles that were strategically placed at doors and windows" in Vernon's home. "There were also several flak jackets and extra magazines strategically located," according to the affidavit. Vernon and "CS-1" traveled to Anchorage for a militia convention in February -- Cox couldn’t go because his wife had just had a baby -- where they met up with "CS-2" in an effort to obtain grenades and explosives, according to the affidavit. CS-1 drove to Anchorage and back to Fairbanks with Vernon and recorded their conversations on the trip, the affidavit said.
by Matthew Carberry | March 30, 2011 - 2:52pm
Coincidentally, a study on actual criminal use of suppressors by an Alaskan Public Defender. http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v08n2/44.clark/clark.pdf cedar, Don't get me wrong, there's no excuse for these dangerous clowns breaking any law, tax or other, particularly because they were serious about killing people. The charges appear to be sound and hopefully they will get swift and certain justice. I'm in no way defending them, just pointing out an unnecessary regulation of what is and always has been a hearing safety device.
by cedar | March 29, 2011 - 6:53pm
Tribal Feudalism vs. Organized Society. These guys are saying that their "common law court" has authority over the state and federal courts?? Yea right!! What about the Constitution? Remember, it's a federal document. Always has been, always will be. "No man is an island."
by cedar | March 29, 2011 - 5:29pm
So what were the grenades going to be for?? Let me guess. They were for hunting and fishing. Also, wouldn't it just be easier to pay your property taxes? I mean what if your child or wife has an emergency and you need public services such as fire department help or a hospital helicopter?? Do these same people drive on public roads that tax money has paid for ??
by Matthew Carberry | March 28, 2011 - 3:54pm
Bob, Did a little more checking. Over the counter in France, Norway and Finland, no need to prove you have a gun at all, registered or otherwise. More or less automatic permit in Sweden, varying degrees of regulation in other countries usually paralleling increased firearms regs in general. Over there they are most commonly used for hunting and at ranges so as not to disturb others with noise and to protect the hearing of shooters and the people nearby. Exactly as they were used in this country prior to 1934. Setting aside issues of firearms regulation, regulating a simple safety device with a wide variety of positive uses simply because it might be misused, particularly based on all the bad info out there on what suppressors really do (muffle, not eliminate sound), is not the rational way to go. That said, there's no excuse for breaking that law, particularly for violent nutjobs like these.
by NewAmericaNow | March 28, 2011 - 12:53pm
Schaeffer, The Real American People support you. These obviously are trumped up charges and the desparate act of a dying empire in ruin. We are inspired by this intelligent young man who is a true defender of Liberty and justice for all. You are not alone in this land.
by Matthew Carberry | March 28, 2011 - 8:40am
Bob, As far as I know, yes, they all have more firearms registration than we do. That wasn't my point on the suppressors. Our laws on suppressors, which were available over the counter and sold for what they are, hearing safety equipment, did not come about because of any real use of suppressors in crime but rather because they were -perceived- to be "used by gangsters". That said, the stamp only adds $200 to the price of the functional equivalent of your cars muffler.
by El Bob | March 27, 2011 - 1:51pm
Okay, question - if in many "developed European countries" that allow firearms can any idiot own a firearm of the type generally fitted with a suppressor (handgun, flavor-of-the-month tactical sub-gun, etc), or are there restrictions, licenses and mandatory firearms training required prior to the purchase and ownership of said firearm? Oh, and Switzerland doesn't count. Those weapons are government issue.
by SPECKLEFOOT | March 27, 2011 - 1:39pm
Sounds like a set up to me----these two "informers" had problems of their own that the feds twisted into motive to set up Cox and the others. It's pathetic that our government has stooped to transparent manipulation of this kind. Don't they have real terrorists to chase after, instead of harassing and entrapping Americans?
by Matthew Carberry | March 27, 2011 - 9:30am
Just a small correction. Automatic weapons, suppressors and grenades are not "illegal" to own, they simply require the purchase of Federal tax stamps. As an aside, unlike the USA, in many "developed European countries" that allow firearms suppressors are available over the counter with no regulation as they are properly considered a hearing safety device as well as a courtesy to others. Anyway, National Firearms Act violations are just violations of tax law. |













Comments