New drilling operation begins in Alaska's Cook Inlet
Patti Epler |
Aug 22, 2011
Despite protests from environmental watchdog groups, a new oil and gas drilling operation has begun in Cook Inlet and is churning its way toward a potential $25 million boost from the state. The Spartan Blake 151 jack-up drilling rig, operated by Escopeta Oil Co., arrived on site north of Nikiski on Aug. 10 after a long and controversial journey from the Gulf of Mexico to Alaska. Steve Sutherlin, an Alaska-based spokesman for the company, said Monday the rig is currently in position over the well and crews are driving casing into place. The casing, 30 inches in diameter and an inch-and-a-half thick, is to prevent a shallow gas blowout. Once the casing is in place, a blowout preventer will be installed. That blowout preventer needs to be inspected and approved by the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, he said. Escopeta plans to spud the well by the end of the month, coming in just under a deadline set by the Legislature for drilling to begin in order for the company to take advantage of an incentive program passed late last year. Lawmakers offered to pay for as much as 100 percent -- up to $25 million for the first well -- of the cost of the first three wells for the first company to bring a jack-up rig to the area and begin work. Company officials have said Escopeta expects to spend about $30 million to get the rig into place, between mobilization costs and other expenses to satisfy state requirements. A couple weeks ago, two environmental organizations -- Trustees for Alaska and Cook Inletkeeper -- asked federal regulators to prevent Escopeta from bringing the rig into Cook Inlet because of concerns over the effects on beluga whales. In April, the National Marine Fisheries Service designated more than 300 square miles of Cook Inlet as critical habitat for the iconic white whale, which has been listed as endangered since 2008. Conservationists are worried that oil and gas activities, especially noise produced by drilling rigs, will further harm the whales. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers responded by asking Escopeta for additional information and updating an environmental review of the proposed operation. Last week, NMFS concurred in the findings and the necessary permits were issued to the company. Bob Shavelson of Cook Inletkeeper is concerned that the company and the regulators are rushing to meet the drilling deadline for the state incentives rather then thoughtfully reviewing the company's ability to respond to an oil spill, for instance, or whether the blowout preventer and other equipment are adequate. "It doesn't feel like there's been reasonable agency oversight when it comes to beluga whales or the adequacy of spill response," he said. "It appears to us that the Army Corps rushed ahead and issued a permit without understanding the impacts to the beluga whale. And we've watched NMFS buckle to political pressure time and time again." Shavelson and Brian Litmans, an attorney with Trustees for Alaska, said the groups will be reviewing the agency's action and deciding whether they need to step up their protests of the operation. Sutherlin said Escopeta has taken extra steps to address the issue of the whales. Not only did it provide the extra engineering study the corps requested in order to secure the permit, but the company also has put in place other environmental programs aimed at watching out for the whales. "We ended up going a bit further with beluga whale research than we thought," he said. The company also has started a beluga observation program that includes participation from contractors. Oil rig workers, pilots and boat operators working for the company are recording sightings of belugas, their behavior and location among other details, to provide to NMFS. Escopeta is working with another company to monitor noise around the rig during various phases of the drilling operation. And it plans to basically slow down or shut down operations if necessary to avoid harassing the whales, Sutherlin said. The company plans to drill until Oct. 31, wrapping up in plenty of time before ice moves into Cook Inlet, he said.
by AKgasman | August 24, 2011 - 12:21pm
Several years ago they(?) were doing seismic work in the Gulf Baja California where the large whales, not Belugas, winter and they noticed that the whales showed no response to seismic work when it was expected the whales in fact would respond to the considerable noise. The whales igorned it as if the seismic work did not exist. Also: Some years ago, when this phony baloney/ beluga issue arose. I advised the Muni of Anchorage and the State of Alaska that there was away for the City and/or State to show that this beluga whale designation was a fraud. What was once free is no, you are not respected unless you ask for money. Because of begin ignored. It would have cost them $100,000 to win on belugas and if they when to court on their own and lost it would cost them $500,000 up front on a no win/ no pay basis. Subsequent to that the City Port director has said the City has spent millions because of Belugas. (for a Port Begich admitted Anchorage did not need) Because of who the City Port director is and his past history, I question that millions were spent. It would not be the first time he was caught in fraud. In any event, there has been a law suit and now it will cost the City and /or the State $500,000 if they want to win or they can continue to pursue their suits in ignorance. This is not an indefinite offer and it may be revoked and increased as they continue to lose. The more the city and or State screws around and continues to lose the more it will cost them. If they are going urinate away millions and lose I want the $500,000 to win. no win/ no pay to teach the SOB’s to ignore me. Now an epistle: I am green, real hard core green, but rational about development. There are real serious green issues at both the State and National levels that the obstructionist greenie camp is not able to wrap their opportunistic minds around let alone address.
by jmacinak | August 23, 2011 - 11:21pm
..strike it big in gas, and we can keep exports going from Nikiski, maybe entice the fertilizer business to start back up on the Kenai. That new "storage area" for inlet gas will be pressured up big time if they hit it big out there. Excess (if enough) could also be added to the Valdez line across the Glenallen leg down to Valdez if there were a big enough discovery (pipelines can run gas in both directions). That would add to the economic strength of an all-Alaskan project, as it reaches a wider market as LNG, versus a flooded market to Alberta and points beyond in the gas gutted lower 48. It also would act to keep the in-state tariff down for in-state gas users. ALL of them. |













Comments