Rick Sinnott and the secret moose calf disposal site
Rick Sinnott |
Feb 14, 2012
Joe Louis, the world heavyweight boxing champion, when asked about a challenger, famously remarked, “He can run, but he can’t hide.” Some say the same about retirement from public office. So I asked Rick Sinnott, a former wildlife biologist with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, whether he had done anything unethical during his 28 years with the department. “No,” he said. Sinnott now writes a column for Alaska Dispatch. I asked him if he had seen the comments posted in response to his recent column, “Corey Rossi and the 30 Bear Weekend.” One anonymous reader, DearGaslighteRick, leveled several ethics charges against Sinnott. The chief accusation was: “Aren't you the same public official who told the world that you knew of only one healthy moose calf killed in 15 years, yet you publicly stated that you had a "secret calf disposal site?" “No,” he said, “not quite.” Sinnott acknowledged having been a public official; however, he knows thousands of healthy moose calves are killed every year, mostly by predators. In Anchorage, scores of healthy moose calves are also killed by vehicles, dogs, and fences. What Sinnott “told the world” was that he had killed a single healthy moose calf. Sinnott retired in 2010 after 16 years as the Anchorage area wildlife biologist. In early June 2005, a young moose calf pinned itself between the slats of a picket fence. The homeowner released the calf, but in struggling to get free it had damaged its spine and couldn’t stand. “I’d seen a couple examples of this before,” Sinnott said, “I even took one calf to a veterinarian, but they always died.” This, in other words, was not a healthy calf. Sinnott euthanized the calf, but couldn’t retrieve it because its mother was highly agitated, and he didn’t want to be forced to shoot the cow in self-defense. The next day, after the cow had wandered off, Sinnott picked up the dead calf. When reporter Anne Aurand of the Anchorage Daily News asked what he was going to do with it, Sinnott told her he would take it to “my secret calf disposal site.” The secret siteSinnott often tweaked reporters, but he really did have a secret calf disposal site. He was frequently called upon to dispose of dead moose. Some had starved to death. Some had been sick. Some were hit by a vehicle or tangled in a fence. Some were killed by bears. Most dead moose were salvaged for human consumption. On average, about 160 moose are killed in collisions with vehicles in Anchorage every year. Some years Sinnott also shot one or two moose considered a serious threat to the public, such as repeatedly charging bikers from the woods. All of these were salvaged by organizations from a list maintained by Alaska State Troopers. If he didn’t know the cause of death or if the moose had been dead a day or more, Sinnott had four choices. • Find a trapper who was willing to remove the moose for bait. Trappers remove 20 or so dead moose from Anchorage every winter but, because trapping seasons end in mid to late winter, Sinnott had fallback options. • Tell the homeowner to deal with the dead moose. • Take it to the landfill. • Take it somewhere else. Moving a dead moose is not easy. Most adult moose weigh 700 to 1,000 pounds. By October, even calves weigh 300 to 350 pounds. Some moose carcasses are found in a road right-of-way or other public area, like a park or military reservation. In these situations, Sinnott contacted the land manager and asked them to remove the carcass. Moose found dead on private property are the responsibility of the property owner. In rare situations, a homeowner was elderly or ill equipped to deal with a dead moose, so Sinnott or another Fish and Game employee took the moose away.
by dee1127 | March 21, 2012 - 8:19am
any unbiased person reading this article would realize Rick isn't patting his own back, he is merely responding to a comment made by gaslighterick. If you are looking for the "dirt" on Rick, you won't find any.
by the schnoz | February 19, 2012 - 12:05pm
Wow...Rick writes about Rick...and Alaska Dispatch allows guest columnists to stoop to a new low...(and to the schnoz, it's pretty smelly stuff)... So what am I to take away from this article or commentary or editorial or whatever this mess is... Part I: a former/retired Fish & Game biologist has the rare opportunity to pat his own back concerning his 16 years of service and spends it explaining his flippant attitude and how it caused him trouble. But of course it was all explainable (but why did it need explaining)? Part II: After clearing thy name, then the real nature of the article comes out: attack thy detractors. But it seems to be old, old stuff--that doesn't fit with today's news. I did some research into your detractors, and it seems that this mighty dragon, the moose federation, has received some state funding and is trying to do something with that money (and by all accounts is actually having some effect that others might consider positive). So what is this moose group really, a dragon in disguise, or your personal windmill, Rick? You might try some basic research and ask the questions that only a former/retired biologist can ask of your foes. Then we might get a real column worth reading, not an exercise in arrogance. Paul (aka "the schnoz")
by beentheredonethat | February 17, 2012 - 6:12pm
Thanks for the article. I saw the previous comment on the secret disposal site and wondered about it. Now I know.
by jlar555 | February 16, 2012 - 1:29am
I appreciate this article for its intriguing relevatory aspects, but I'm puzzled over the use of the third rather than first person narration. Why, other than the obvious, which isn't compelling? Joe LaRocca
by jwcehc | February 15, 2012 - 4:36pm
I see Rick is now talking to himself and reporting on it. Amazing what the AK Dispatch will print in the name of journalism.
by alaskanomad | February 15, 2012 - 8:56pm
No one is making you read it. Maybe you prefer Fox Noise.
by jwcehc | February 16, 2012 - 7:23am
Trust me, I barely made it through the first page. That there are 4 pages of this drivel further amazes me. Still shows that the AK Dispatch would rather print this garbage than provide the ability for differing opinions and perspectives. I know of multiple attempts by other well known former ADF&G biologists to provide the Dispatch with articles, only to be flatly refused. Instead, we get Rick who talks to himself. It is obvious how the slant goes here. Sorry Alice and Scott, but you have turned the AK Dispatch into a mini ADN, and not another true source for information in Alaska.
by OldHat | February 16, 2012 - 6:04pm
Well, first you complain of the use of the 3rd person by Sinnott, framing it as “talking to himself and reporting on it”. You repeat the trope - “Rick who talks to himself” - in service of damming the Dispatch’s content and a claim of “attempts by other well known former ADF&G biologists to provide the Dispatch with articles, only to be flatly refused”. These biologists are not identified. Surprise, surprise. This piece is a response to unsupported accusations of skullduggery, in part made anonymously. And, what appears in the comments but more anonymous, unsupported accusations of skullduggery. Given that you “barely made it through the first page,” you likely missed the last paragraph, especially the last sentence, set-up by the use of the 3rd person.
by coyote1959 | February 15, 2012 - 10:47am
Keep up your lifetime of excellent work for both human and wildlife. Your new columns reflect an intelligent mind combined with legitimate logic to bring sense to the obfuscations and outright lies filling the Corporate Media relative to environmental, wildlife, and human action issues. Unfortunately, your former employers continue to enact policies detrimental to all of the same participants in Alaskan life. Congratulations, once again, for all of your efforts to bring a modicum of truth to counter the false propaganda dominating wildlife and environmental discourse.
by crystalwolfakac... | February 15, 2012 - 10:04am
"Ironically, the same people have complained because, according to them, Sinnott was reluctant to shoot bears or wolves in and near Anchorage. They complained because he refused to drastically reduce numbers of adult moose in Anchorage, which they believe are a threat to kids in neighborhoods and on school grounds." So funny these "ruff and tuff" "Rill" Alaskans always complaining and fearful about the local wildlife. And funny that "Alaska Moose Federation" is doing a "Gaslight" against a Biologist. Rick thanks for explaining about your Secret moose disposal site. I'm so glad there is at least ONE online news org in Alaska that is trustworthy and exposes the unethical frauds that run around Alaska. And thanks Rick for doing your job as a biologist to help all animals. Gaslight smears, sound like Corey and his ilk Palin/heath clan. Oh OT I am reading Crude Awakening and it is very good? Wonder why it hasn't been getting traction up there, but I know why, same as why Rick had to write this article to stop the smears. |













Comments