Spruce growth accelerates on Alaska's treeline as temperatures rise
Doug O'Harra |
Nov 20, 2011
Those tough, gnarled white spruce that eke out an existence at the far northeastern frontier of Alaska's boreal forest have been growing faster in recent decades, apparently boosted by warming temperatures. The findings, based on an extensive analysis of growth rings and wood density going back almost 1,000 years in trees at the tundra edge along Alaska's Firth River are in dramatic contrast to the ailing Interior forests, where warmer temperatures and drought have cut growth rates, increased forest fires and triggered insect outbreaks. "I was expecting to see trees stressed from the warmer temperatures," said lead author Laia Andreu-Hayles, a tree ring scientist at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, in this story. "What we found was a surprise." The research also used new techniques that bolstered the use of tree ring data in climate studies, the scientists said, addressing what had become knotty and sometimes controversial issue. (Some skeptics have argued that tree ring data can't be used to reconstruct pre-modern temperatures. More on this below.) The study, published last month in Environmental Research Letters, is part of a broader effort to track the ecological impact of climate change through dendrochronology -- the study of the growth rings inside trees. As anyone who has ever counted the concentric lines etched into an old stump knows, the quality and intensity of each growing season in a tree’s life gets recorded year by year. "In warm years, trees tend to produce wider, denser rings and in cool years, the rings are typically narrower and less dense," explains this story about the project. "Using this basic idea and samples from a 2002 trip to the refuge, Andreu-Hayles and her colleagues assembled a climate timeline … going back to the year 1067." They examined the tree ring width in 232 samples from 111 trees (30 alive, 81 preserved in the cold climate) that spanned 935 years through 2002. They also looked at the maximum density of new growth late in the season within the rings, based on 246 samples from most of the same trees, covering about the same period of time. "Trees were growing in scattered groves over hilly slopes in an open valley at the Firth River watershed," the scientists wrote in the paper. "The subfossil wood was collected from both standing and toppled dead trees. Collectively, these samples have yielded one of the very few millennial-length tree-ring records available for northern Alaska." What they found was startling. An analysis of tree-ring width and ring density showed increased growth beginning about 100 years ago. After 1950, the trees grew even faster. "For the moment, warmer temperatures are helping the trees along this part of the forest-tundra border," said study coauthor Kevin Anchukaitis, a tree-ring scientist at Lamont, here. "It's a fairly wet, fairly cool, site overall, so those longer growing seasons allow the trees to grow more." The results might help settle one of climate science's ugliest controversies. In the quest to sort out whether the Earth's climate has been warming, scientists have long used tree ring widths as a "proxy" for temperature. It's one of the sources for the much-discussed "hockey stick graph" showing a sudden upswing in temperatures after 1,000 years of stability.
by MTCazador | November 23, 2011 - 7:02pm
Explain to me the oil under the Arctic coast and how it fits into the global warming model.
by Frumious | November 21, 2011 - 8:08am
Trees like CO2. It is their food. As we produce more of it, the trees "eat" more of it and they grow bigger and faster. And they grow farther north. The treeline has crossed on to the north side of the Brooks Range in the past 50 years. This is turn has expanded the habitat of moose and other fauna that dine on them or use them for shelter. Is this good or bad? I suggest it is neither. |













Comments