Suddenly shrinking population of sizable halibut has regulators flummoxed
Craig Medred |
Dec 01, 2011
The halibut fishery of the North Pacific -- long touted as a model for wise fisheries management and the goodness of privatizing commercial fisheries -- is now in such dire straits regulators were Wednesday talking about the possible need to cut harvests to levels not seen since the 1930s. The problem? Adult flatfish are disappearing from the population at unexplainable rates, the International Pacific Halibut Commission was told Wednesday at a meeting in Seattle. Adult fish comprise what the scientists who work for the commission call the "exploitable biomass." These are the halibut capable of breeding and reproducing. These are also the fish targeted by commercial fishermen. "Seventy percent of the total commercial catch is female," commission lead biologist Steven Hare said. The most common halibut caught by commercial longliners, according to commission studies, are 12-year-old females. Those fish comprise more than 15 percent of the entire commercial catch. If life has gone well for such halibut, and they've grown fast enough, they'll likely get to spawn once before they're killed. Commission studies indicate about 50 percent of females reach sexual maturity by age 12. Those that live to be 13 have an even better chance of getting to spawn, but they are also heavily harvested. They comprise more than 10 percent of the commercial catch, according to Hare. All told commercial fishermen take more than a quarter of the allowable harvest of halibut just as the fish are fully reaching spawning age. But that is not the real problem at the moment, Hare said. The real problem is what he called "unspecified mortality." Halibut are disappearing from the population for reasons managers can only guess at. "It's troubling," Hare said. Were managers to take these mystery disappearances fully into consideration, he added, they would be forced to recommend drastic cuts in commercial harvests. One model that does this, he said, suggested setting catches "28 percent lower than the lowest level since 1935." Catches, or at least legal catches, have already been pushed down 55 percent in the past decade, and they are for sure going down again. The only real question is how far down. Hare did not go into the possible reasons for the mysterious decline in what might be called eating-size halibut, but others have. There is a long list of possibilities -- disease, starvation due to competition for food and, of course, overfishing in any of a variety of forms:
Illegal fishing?And there is always the possibility of good, old-fashioned, illegal fishing. Privatization of the halibut fishery was supposed to put an end to this. It gave halibut fishermen an ownership interest in the fish. This was called the individual fishing quota, and it was supposed to help make the average commercial halibut fishermen into a wise steward of the resource.
by entropy1 | December 2, 2011 - 7:40am
The real story is despite the IPHC's best efforts to refine their population model using all KNOWN factors they have still overestimated halibut abundance. Facts: There are more halibut than ever but the exploitable biomass, those 32 inches and larger, are not being replenished by the larger than ever number of sublegals. These sublegals, one pound "ping-pong paddles" have run the natural mortality gauntlet and won. Most natural halibut mortality occurs from the egg to up to 5 inches long. After that, and especially with the sublegal that show up in the trawl and longline surveys, nothing much eats these halibut. So why are they disappearing??? 60-120 foot trawlers have 33% observer coverage when fishing but they get to "game" the system by choosing when take an observer. They make one tow in a safe, no bycatch, location right in front of town at 11:30 pm, pick up and make another at 12:05 am then go drop off the observer and voila! two days coverage. Multiply this on a fishery wide scale. Here in Kodiak we hear stories, and watch cellphone videos ( http://tholepin.blogspot.com/ ), from trawl deckhands of massive tows of dead pingpong paddle halibut that go unaccounted. Trawlers try to spin this with the "everybody has bycatch" argument. The difference is the scale and the resulting effect. Individual trawlers have killed 100,000 lbs of these one pound halibut in a day or two. These large kills almost always occur when trawlers are fishing with no observers, not when they are gameing the system pretend fishing barren ground to get their required observer coverage. Expand this industry wide and do you think this might be the factor IPHC scientists are missing?
by Oldhaines | December 2, 2011 - 4:35pm
I am not going to argue that the Trawlers are killing a huge amount of Halibut as bycatch but I sure wish you would not try to stretch the truth. you are not the only person who has seen that video and the fish depicted there are not one pound fish by any stretch. You are on the right track here but stick to supportable claims.
by entropy1 | December 2, 2011 - 5:02pm
Oldhaines, you don't know what you are talking about. There is not "one video" but many. What is your point?? Trying to blow smoke to confuse the issue? There are crew reports daily about bycatch disasters. No truth is being stretched. There was a surprise cod season a few years back where all the draggers had to take observers. Boats owned by Kodiak owners who sat on the NPFMC at the time caught more halibut than the gray cod they were targeting. And the majority were ping pong paddles. We need 100% observer coverage on all draggers and individual bycatch caps to shut down the dirtiest fisherme.
by Oldhaines | December 16, 2011 - 5:01pm
I have been following this issue very closely for a number of years and have only ever seen one such video. Perhaps you could be persuaded to share some of yours with us for the common good?
by Oldhaines | December 1, 2011 - 2:36pm
So let hell break loose. Price of retail Halibut in Juneau has remained above $21.00 a pound for more than a year and is currently at $22.99.Used to be I could run out in the bay with a skiff and get a years fish in a day or two of fishing now It's getting to be a neat trick if you can do it in a season. Perhaps we need to slow both the longliners and the charter boats down. WHO REPRESENTS THE COMMON PERSONAL USE FISHERMAN ON THE COMMISSION?
by Oldhaines | December 1, 2011 - 3:29pm
Oh, I forgot to mention, Live Maine lobster is available at Superbear in Juneau in the tank next to the Halibut display, $9.99 a pound. That is not a sale price, it's generally available most of the year and that's the normal price per pound. How the hell do they do it? They air freight it from Maine to Alaska deliver it still alive. And still beat locally caught almost fresh halibut by $13.00 a pound. I am still boycotting Halibut.
by jwcehc | December 1, 2011 - 11:23am
Time to require the trawlers to retain and process all by-catch halibut and salmon for human consumption, then turn it over to the state for use at prisons and food banks just as if they had been caught fishing illegally. When it finally becomes an expense for them to have to deal with, that also takes up hold space, then and only then will they not catch and waste so much eddible fish and waste the resource.
by coyote1959 | December 1, 2011 - 10:39am
"The halibut fishery of the North Pacific -- long touted as a model for wise fisheries management and the goodness of privatizing commercial fisheries --..." Just as false as the entire concept of "privatization" as nothing more than license to steal all of the natural resources wherever its ugly, false, philosophical head appears. Wherever the appellations, CONservative, free market, and privatization appear in discourse, they can now be certified to be criminal enterprises devoted to adding to the wealth of the few over the lives of the many. All Corporate Media propaganda virtues for the same to the contrary.
by bobatkinson | December 1, 2011 - 10:34am
On a halibut charter out of Seward last year we caught many and mostly dog sharks until we moved to the "chicken hole" where we finally caught a bunch of small halibut and a few cod. The skipper has seen a marked increase in the number of dog sharks being caught and felt that they were a real cause of the halibut number plummeting. He thought there should be a commercial harvest of the sharks for a few years but didn't say how you would keep the young halibut and cod off the long lines.
by tiglax | December 1, 2011 - 9:16am
Bombshell! The biggest waster of halibut (in bycatch) is still the trawl fleet. They have to take responsibility NOW! They cannot continue to waste $7 per pound halibut while targeting fish valued at way less per pound. How can managers continue to overlook this obscene waste of a resource?
by ragnarock | December 2, 2011 - 9:57am
stop the trawl fishery, it is this centuries equivelent of drift nets,a long outdated fishery that sacrifices all other fisheries for the profit of huge corporations,while caring nothing for the resorce, also,declare charter boats to be a commercial fishery and bring them under limited entry permits limit entry |














Comments