Update from the Renda: 'Homeward Bound'
Capt. Pete Garay |
Jan 14, 2012
Update Jan 19 10:05 a.m., from Capt. Peter Garay, about three hours after the Renda completed transferring her fuel load to storage tanks on shore in Nome: Homeward Bound
Update Jan 14 5:12 p.m., from Capt. Carter Whalen: The Renda just made it into the final position. Update Jan 14 10:27 a.m., from Capt. Carter Whalen:
The original approach for both vessels was to be from East to West in a sweeping arc. As a result of visual ice observations, the approach was initiated last night from West to East. That approach could be completed as soon as today. Many might ask, "Why has this taken so long? Both vessels have been near Nome for some time now." Patience has seen this mission through many challenges. Patience will afford this operation the best chance of success. Update Jan 14, sometime in the morning, from Capt. Peter Garay: Yesterday while picking our way through the hardened rubble field that we encountered eight miles south of Nome I sent my Friend Edward Itta in Barrow an E- mail asking him if there is an Inupiaq term for when the ice is uncooperative. To which Mayor Edward Itta replied:
by mit | January 13, 2012 - 7:59pm
Should have just flown it in.
by El Bob | January 13, 2012 - 7:04pm
Why does the media present this as an epic adventure on par with the serum run of legend? Where is the condemnation of the environmental advocacy groups of the very tangible risks of a major arctic spill? Where is the questioning of the necessity of the very real threats to the lives of the crews of both ships and the costs to the taxpayers resulting from the Healy being forced to remain on station after its scheduled deployment ended? Everyone loves a good drama, me included, and nothing should diminish the bravery and fortitude of the men and women of the Renda and the Healy. Unfortunately, the only reason this is happening is that someone in Nome forgot they live in Alaska. The media should remain mindful of that simple fact.
by zidar | January 11, 2012 - 9:51am
Hope they remembered to bring a few dogs to eat.
by grant5 | January 10, 2012 - 8:47pm
Of interest to me is to think back to 1963, while working on the Nome Teller Highway (renamed the Bob Blogett Highway), the common perception was that its purpose was to make overland transport from Grantley Inlet(a natural seaport) to Nome rather than barge in from vessels offshore Nome.
by smilla | January 10, 2012 - 12:03am
Alright Capt. Garay. Love the McQueen ref :) Good luck and thanks for keeping our oceans safe :)
by captained | January 6, 2012 - 9:57pm
Thank you Captain Garay for the excellent work you and your fellow pilots do. Pilots are the professionals that help to insure that the waters of Alaska remain unspoiled as they deliver the ships, their cargo, crew and passengers safely to their destination.
by AKgasman | January 6, 2012 - 1:25pm
POints out the need for very large Finnish designed ice braker with a US nuclear propulsion system like they use on US subs and aircraft cariers. constructed in the US. But thay is more than the Alaska congressional deligation can wrap their minds around.
by jonhammond | January 6, 2012 - 12:10am
First it was onto Nome with the Iditarod dogs teams, then Iditabikes and now it's the new Ididatanker event. Throttle back those home thermostats until your Renda arrives Nomites. Good luck to all involved in this exercise. It's 600 nautical miles from Nome to Barrow. Why not ship minimally refined basic heating oil directly from Producers on the slope to Nome and other Western communities during our ice free summer months. Can't be a whole lot more expensive than shipping oil down TAPS, tanker onto Washington State's refinery, ship it back to Dutch then onto Nome. Milage ....TAPS 800 mi., Valdez-Anacortes 1,275 nm, back to Dutch 1,700 nm, Dutch to Nome 700 NM for a total of 4,400 nautical miles. Just say'n.
by Oldhaines | January 6, 2012 - 12:17pm
Nice idea, getting fuel from the slope. No matter how you count these villages they still represent a very small market and that magnifies the overhead costs to the consumer. Is there any refining already done there? as far as I am aware all the stuff going down the pipe is crude oil. I guess a refinery could be built In deadhorse or somewhere but since the greens have opposed building new refineries anywhere else in the united state for many years I cannot imagine the legal mess trying to build one on the north slope would be, twenty years in court? Now Natural Gas, is a different matter. It comes from the well in a generally useable form that requires very little refining and could be transported down the west coast via a low or no impact winter road. very little infrastructure would be required and delivery would remain possible most of the year.
by El Bob | January 14, 2012 - 6:41pm
There you go again, proposing reasonable solutions. Haven't you learned better by now?
by OldHat | January 13, 2012 - 4:59pm
The slope’s oil producers scrapped the idea of building a ~$250 million refinery to replace their existing one on the slope that couldn’t meet the low sulfur diesel standard when the State wouldn’t allow them to count it as investment tax credit (meaning State tax reduction up-front) rather than as maintenance (lower State tax over time). They opted to truck product from Fairbanks. A refinery’s a huge amount up front that likely never pencils out because of the small market. You could put together a project to use Prudhoe NG or some that comes up to the Arctic coast from NPRA for Barrow’s use - though I don’t claim to know how much more could be delivered by the Barrow supply system. But NG doesn’t do much for the existing infrastructure that uses fuel oil/diesel for heating and diesel for power generation. Nor the vehicles that use gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel. That’s what the Renda is carrying. Why build and even a minimal road to transport fuel by land when almost all the users are on the coast or navigable rivers? Water routes aren’t always as direct as one wishes but they’re remarkably cheap, both up-front and in operation.
by Justlorraine | January 7, 2012 - 12:52pm
Refining is done in North Pole by the Flint Hills Corp. As far as I have read, they only refine jet fuel. That leaves Alaskans with high fuel prices no matter where we live. I drive over the pipeline at least twice every day and am always annoyed at our fuel prices. Another problem is that Sulfolane got into the ground water of many homes in North Pole from the refinery. It seems that fossil fuels, while a neccessary fuel source always come at a higher price than we are willing to anticipate.
by coyote1959 | January 6, 2012 - 10:07am
But that logic would eliminate all of the "profits" generated at each step of the way for those "poor" components of the "CONsortium".
by taminak | January 5, 2012 - 3:12pm
A bit overly dramatic don't you think. "Shackletonesque"? Hardly, they have a USCG Icebreaker escort. "Small orange ship"? Its over 300 feet LOA. 15 foot seas outside of Dutch harbor is the norm. I understand the importance of getting fuel to Nome for the winter but lets be honest here its not Shackletonesque. As a matter of fact there is an entire fleet of fishing vessels less than half the size of the Renda who deal with those conditions on a regular basis. 15 foot seas? Thats gear setting weather!!! |













Comments