'Xena' actress Lucy Lawless, Greenpeace occupy Alaska-bound oil drilling ship
Alex DeMarban |
Feb 23, 2012
Shell Oil Co. offshore Alaska drilling operations aren't safe even from "Xena the Warrior Princess." Lucy Lawless, the actress who played the sexy, swashbuckling heroine of the cult classic named for her character, "Xena," scaled the derrick of an Alaska-bound drillship Thursday with Greenpeace activists to protest exploratory oil drilling she believes could "devastate" the fragile Arctic environment and accelerate global warming, according to a statement from the pro-environment organization. The Noble Discoverer ship, contracted by Shell to drill up to three exploratory wells this summer, was leaving Auckland, New Zealand, bound for Chukchi Sea waters off Alaska, according to the release. "I'm blocking Shell's Arctic drillship because I believe passionately that renewable energy is the way of the future," Lucy said from the ship, according to the release. Shell spokeswoman Kelly op de Weegh said the company respects freedom of speech, but isn't pleased with Greenpeace's tactics. The company is in contact with local authorities to keep the ship on path toward Alaska, she said. "We are disappointed that Greenpeace has chosen this method to protest," she said. "Actions such as this jeopardize the safety of everyone involved. While we respect the right of individuals to express their point of view, the priority should be the safety of Noble’s personnel and that of the protestors. Six Greenpeace activists, as well as Lawless, a 43-year-old mother of three now co-starring in the TV show "Spartacus," blocked the ship from the leaving the port of Taranaki for its 6,000-mile trip, the release said. The dill-rig invaders apparently expect to stay a while: the release notes they have several days of supplies. Op de Weegh confirmed that the Noble Discoverer is currently at port in New Zealand, and said the port had been closed. "Personnel from Noble have been in touch with local authorities," she said, in response to an emailed question about how the company would respond to the boarding. Greenpeace boarded and occupied another Arctic-bound drilling ship, the Leiv Ericksen, operating off Greenland's coast last year. Shell says it has safely drilled exploratory wells off Alaska's coasts before, in the 1980s, and that it found oil and gas but never developed because global prices bottomed out and Arctic drilling became cost-prohibitive. Shell invested $2 billion to obtain leases in the Chukchi Sea in 2007. With high prices in recent years, Shell is back and hopes to begin drilling exploratory wells in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas in U.S. waters this summer. The Hague-based oil conglomerate says it will exceed U.S. environmental safety requirements in its Arctic drilling efforts, and plans to employ sophisticated technology to reduce air emissions and a specially built capping and containment system to prevent an oil spill. "Shell has taken unprecedented steps to pursue safe, environmentally responsible exploration in shallow water off the coast of Alaska," op de Weegh said. "We recognize that industry's license to operate in the offshore is predicated on being able to operate in a safe, environmentally sound manner." Greenpeace warns that a successful strike by Shell will launch a polar oil rush, threatening the relatively pristine Arctic. Environmentalists have warned that no technology exists to clean oil from the region's thick sea ice. "We don’t have to go to the ends of the Earth to suck out every last drop of oil. Instead we need to smarten up and begin the transition to a clean, green, sustainable energy future and right now that means keeping Shell out of the Arctic." Shell has recently been steaming ahead in its efforts to win regulatory approval to drill this summer in the Arctic seas, recently receiving an air permit for the Noble Discoverer and related ships. Environmental groups said Tuesday they're challenging the permit in court. Contact Alex DeMarban at alex(at)alaskadispatch.com
by ertdfg | February 27, 2012 - 10:09am
So we should give up on oil and use only renewable fuels, like algae produced gasoline... which currently costs $33/gallon to make? Fine, great idea... I'm sure everyone can afford $33/gallon gas. Oh, and transportation costs. I hope everyone is ok with food, clothing, and all other goods costing ten times as much due to this increased cost. But I'm sure everyone will be ok, the entire nation is full of rich people who have tons of money and can easily afford paying a lot more for everything. What? The poor can't afford bread at the new prices? Oh, Lucy has a brilliant solution. Let them eat cake... seems to solve everything... right? Hey, if you can't trespass, block usage of property (basically theft) in your quest to starve off a few million people to block oil drilling that exceeds current environmental standards then something is wrong... or something like that. What's the real end goal here again? Is the goal actually starvation, or do they somehow think that $33/gallon is a good price for gasoline and really workable without causing serious hardships for the poor? I'm sorry that it's got your panties in a twist; but we need the oil; so get the heck out of the way... your inability to think your way through the problem before doing something stupid and illegal aren't impressing me.
by eriv | February 26, 2012 - 3:27pm
We will probably be giving tax credits for this.
by thulefoth | February 24, 2012 - 6:07pm
I'd like to see both the individual participants, and the organization behind them, charged with trespass and made liable for the daily operating expenses of the business they've interfered with. We the public pays the costs of humoring these self-indulgent people. Of course, otoh, feeding 'Occupy' all the rope they thought they should have does seem to be working out well.
by wordsnorth | February 24, 2012 - 12:24pm
They should go ahead and journey north. If they are still on board once they get to the Arctic, put them to work as roustabouts--they'll be begging to get off in no time once they experience a little real work.
by m3425man | February 24, 2012 - 8:30am
I would just start moving the ship with them protestors on it. How much publicity are they going to get in the middle of the Pacific? Plus, eventually they will want food and a hot shower...
by Oldhaines | February 23, 2012 - 8:11pm
Greenpeace is nothing more or less than a terror organization.
by captlou3 | February 23, 2012 - 5:32pm
Thank God for people like Lucy. Without these kinds of individuals the planet is doomed, the oil companies and the politicians that are in their pocket could care less.
by m3425man | February 24, 2012 - 2:09pm
What has she (Lucy) actually done to make life better on the planet?
by nate rino | February 23, 2012 - 2:21pm
I wonder if I could get an address of Lucy lawless and greenpeace to send my gas charges and oil bill? with this kind of crap, it's only going up and it's their fault!
by ragnarock | February 24, 2012 - 7:29am
thatis the point
by nate rino | February 23, 2012 - 3:09pm
morons and idiots send them their money, I want to balance it out and send them my bills!
by Jack | February 23, 2012 - 2:17pm
Alex, you forgot to mention in the article that her emotional rant is just a cover- She's actually highly schooled in arctic engineering, technology and petroleum sciences. Really- |













Comments