September 2, 2010

Alaska Dispatch

Twitter Facebook YouTube RSS
Tundra Telegraph

Trucking LNG: A short-term gas solution?

| Sep 29, 2009

The Alaska Gasline Port Authority announced Tuesday plans to purchase Fairbanks Natural Gas, including a 10-year gas supply contract the distributor holds with ExxonMobil Corp. on the North Slope.

Authority officials say the project would "substantially" lower energy costs in Fairbanks, acknowledging there is the potential for liquefied natural gas (LNG) sales to Southcentral Alaska to help meet shortages during times of peak demand in winter.

A separate agreement between the port authority and Golden Valley Electric Association, a Fairbanks utility, is in the works to find an anchor customer for high volumes of gas to power a North Pole electric plant.
FNG President Dan Britton shopped the plan among lawmakers during the last legislative session, seeking state funding for a $250 million LNG plant on the North Slope. FNG had the gas but not the financing, and many lawmakers were dismissive of his proposal.

Under the deal announced Tuesday, the port authority would gain FNG's assets, including the gas supply contract for up to 17 billion cubic feet a year, and a gas liquefaction plant at Point MacKenzie.

Currently, FNG liquefies Cook Inlet gas, then trucks the LNG to Fairbanks to supply about 1,100 homes and businesses.

But if the proposal -- and the revenue bonds -- go through, the Southcentral liquefaction plant could be retrofitted as a regasification plant. LNG could be trucked from the North Slope, hauled hundreds of miles south and stored at Point MacKenzie, where it then would be turned back into a gas and fed into the distribution system to meet peak demand on the coldest winter days, Britton said.

The port authority and FNG figure the North Slope liquefaction plant could be started within two years. The authority would sell gas to customers on a cost-of-service basis, not as a for-profit, Britton said.

And if a large-diameter natural gas pipeline is ever built, either to Valdez or Canada?

"We see those projects as at least a minimum of 10 years out," Britton said. "This project could be a bridge to that bigger opportunity. Or, in the event those other projects don't come to fruition, it's a huge insurance policy for the Interior and other areas. We've protected ourselves."

At this point, the port authority has signed a letter of "intent to purchase" with FNG, and Golden Valley's board approved a memorandum of understanding to buy the LNG at a meeting Monday night.

Bill Walker, the port authority's general counsel and project manager, announced Monday he's running for governor in 2010. Walker said his campaign will center on an "all-Alaska" natural gas pipeline from the North Slope to Valdez.

Contact Rena Delbridge at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Discuss
Member Comments
Posted By: woodman @ 10.01.2009 3:31 PM
Any bonds sold by the Port Authority can not be backed by any government enity, like a City,
Borough or the State: that's by law. So, if the bonds don't sell even at a high interest rate, it means that the "market" doesn't think too much of the project [that it is not worthy of investment]. Time and the "market" will tell if the "public" thinks the Port Authority trucking plan is worth doing and
investing in. No market for the bonds means it a poor idea. In addition, a "rating organization like Best's will review the plan & assign a A,B,C, rating to the bond, showing it's confidence in the project, giving a good idea of it's value.
Posted By: Immaq @ 09.30.2009 8:53 PM
What about the rural energy price crisis? Oh, Okay, they don't! Right! Oh, the Republicans are in Charge, right, right. Okay.
Posted By: jim @ 09.30.2009 9:11 AM
LNG also gets shipped by trains. It wouldn't happen this year, but if Doyon's Nenana well is productive, I wonder if trains could be used to ship LNG from Nenana to various locations along the Railbelt.
Posted By: woodman @ 09.29.2009 6:46 PM
The Port Authority had a "voter mandate" to build a pipeline from the North Slope to Valdez, nothing mandated about changing it's plans to buy a "trucking company" hauling LNG! Where is the "authority" to do this? They refuse to release monthly, quarterly & current annual audits of how they have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of public tax money! Where is their accountabilty?
They're attorney is running of Governor. Fairbanks current Mayor & mostly the next Mayor sit on the Port Authority's Board of Directors. The rest of the Board are the long time "good old boys" of Fairbanks politics. "Good Grief" said Charlie Brown,"What's this all about"!
Posted By: bgkeithley @ 09.29.2009 6:40 PM
Interesting development. AGPA deserves credit for creativity; not as certain about economic judgment. The question will be whether the revenue bonds can be sold solely based on the project, or will need the backing of the governmental entities to sell. If the latter, the market will be suggesting a judgment about the economic viability of the project.

busy